Texas 2015 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB1704 House Committee Report / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 9, 2015      TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1704 by Deshotel (Relating to disclosure of pregnancy or the existence of a gestational agreement in a suit for the dissolution of a marriage and standing of an intended parent under a gestational agreement to file a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill amends Chapter 6 of the Family Code to require that the petition in a suit for dissolution of marriage state whether a party to the marriage is pregnant. The bill also amends Chapter 102 of the Family Code to give an intended parent under an authorized gestation agreement standing to file an original suit. The Office of Court Administration anticipates no significant fiscal impact to the state court system resulting from this bill.  The bill would go into effect on September 1, 2015.  Local Government Impact No significant fiscal impact to local courts is anticipated.     Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council   LBB Staff:  UP, ESi, MH, CG    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 9, 2015





  TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1704 by Deshotel (Relating to disclosure of pregnancy or the existence of a gestational agreement in a suit for the dissolution of a marriage and standing of an intended parent under a gestational agreement to file a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted  

TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1704 by Deshotel (Relating to disclosure of pregnancy or the existence of a gestational agreement in a suit for the dissolution of a marriage and standing of an intended parent under a gestational agreement to file a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

 Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues 

 Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB1704 by Deshotel (Relating to disclosure of pregnancy or the existence of a gestational agreement in a suit for the dissolution of a marriage and standing of an intended parent under a gestational agreement to file a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

HB1704 by Deshotel (Relating to disclosure of pregnancy or the existence of a gestational agreement in a suit for the dissolution of a marriage and standing of an intended parent under a gestational agreement to file a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill amends Chapter 6 of the Family Code to require that the petition in a suit for dissolution of marriage state whether a party to the marriage is pregnant. The bill also amends Chapter 102 of the Family Code to give an intended parent under an authorized gestation agreement standing to file an original suit. The Office of Court Administration anticipates no significant fiscal impact to the state court system resulting from this bill.  The bill would go into effect on September 1, 2015. 

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal impact to local courts is anticipated. 

Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council

212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council

LBB Staff: UP, ESi, MH, CG

 UP, ESi, MH, CG