BILL ANALYSIS Senate Research Center H.B. 1779 84R3373 SRS-F By: Murr (Uresti) State Affairs 5/11/2015 Engrossed
BILL ANALYSIS
Senate Research Center H.B. 1779
84R3373 SRS-F By: Murr (Uresti)
State Affairs
5/11/2015
Engrossed
Senate Research Center
H.B. 1779
84R3373 SRS-F
By: Murr (Uresti)
State Affairs
5/11/2015
Engrossed
AUTHOR'S / SPONSOR'S STATEMENT OF INTENT Currently, the Occupations Code is ambiguous as to when a physician's office is required to release medical records under a court subpoena or order when the patient is not a party to the case. The statute for hospitals is clear, as hospitals may release records under any subpoena when the patient is a party to the case. If the patient is not a party to the case, a hospital does not disclose the information unless there is a court order. H.B. 1779 bring the same clarity that hospitals enjoy to physician offices by aligning the Occupations Code with the Health and Safety Code, which governs hospitals. This uniformity will alleviate an administrative burden on physician offices and ensure patient confidentiality is protected in the release of records. This clarification is especially important as different types of health care providers often partner together and operate within the same system. H.B. 1779 amends current law relating to the disclosure in certain judicial proceedings of confidential communications between a physician and a patient. H.B. 1779 amends current law relating to the confidentiality of a physician's patient information in certain judicial proceedings. RULEMAKING AUTHORITY This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency. SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS SECTION 1. Amends Section 159.003(a), Occupations Code, as follows: (a) Provides that an exception to the privilege of confidentiality in a court or administrative proceeding exists: (1)-(10) Makes no change to these subdivisions; (11) Makes a nonsubstantive change; (12) to comply with a court order, except as provided by Subdivision (13), rather than to a court or a party to an action under a court order or court subpoena; or (13) in a judicial proceeding in which the patient is a party and the disclosure is requested under a subpoena issued under the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the Code of Criminal Procedure, or Chapter 121 (Acknowledgments and Proofs of Written Instruments), Civil Practice and Remedies Code. Deletes existing text providing that an exception to the privilege of confidentiality in a court or administrative proceeding exists to a court or a party to an action under a court order or court subpoena. SECTION 2. Effective date: September 1, 2015.
AUTHOR'S / SPONSOR'S STATEMENT OF INTENT
Currently, the Occupations Code is ambiguous as to when a physician's office is required to release medical records under a court subpoena or order when the patient is not a party to the case. The statute for hospitals is clear, as hospitals may release records under any subpoena when the patient is a party to the case. If the patient is not a party to the case, a hospital does not disclose the information unless there is a court order. H.B. 1779 bring the same clarity that hospitals enjoy to physician offices by aligning the Occupations Code with the Health and Safety Code, which governs hospitals. This uniformity will alleviate an administrative burden on physician offices and ensure patient confidentiality is protected in the release of records. This clarification is especially important as different types of health care providers often partner together and operate within the same system.
H.B. 1779 amends current law relating to the disclosure in certain judicial proceedings of confidential communications between a physician and a patient.
H.B. 1779 amends current law relating to the confidentiality of a physician's patient information in certain judicial proceedings.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
This bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, institution, or agency.
SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS
SECTION 1. Amends Section 159.003(a), Occupations Code, as follows:
(a) Provides that an exception to the privilege of confidentiality in a court or administrative proceeding exists:
(1)-(10) Makes no change to these subdivisions;
(11) Makes a nonsubstantive change;
(12) to comply with a court order, except as provided by Subdivision (13), rather than to a court or a party to an action under a court order or court subpoena; or
(13) in a judicial proceeding in which the patient is a party and the disclosure is requested under a subpoena issued under the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the Code of Criminal Procedure, or Chapter 121 (Acknowledgments and Proofs of Written Instruments), Civil Practice and Remedies Code.
Deletes existing text providing that an exception to the privilege of confidentiality in a court or administrative proceeding exists to a court or a party to an action under a court order or court subpoena.
SECTION 2. Effective date: September 1, 2015.