Texas House Bill HB2173

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to quorum and voting requirements for the transaction of business by the board of the Irving Flood Control District Section III of Dallas County.

Impact

The bill's passage is expected to enhance the governance of the Irving Flood Control District by providing clearer guidelines for board operations. By enshrining specific quorum and voting standards in the law, it legitimizes prior actions and decisions made by the board, thus preventing any legal challenges to those actions based on procedural irregularities. This move also reflects an effort to stabilize administrative procedures within local government bodies, which may lead to improved governance and accountability in flood control management.

Summary

House Bill 2173 aims to clarify and establish the quorum and voting requirements for the board of the Irving Flood Control District Section III of Dallas County. Specifically, it dictates that a quorum shall consist of three directors and that any action or recommendation made by the board must receive at least three affirmative votes in order to be considered valid. This aims to streamline the decision-making processes within the board and ensure that actions are properly validated through a minimum level of support among board members.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 2173 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among local governance advocates who value clarity in procedural regulations. The bill is seen as a necessary step to ensure effective functioning of the Irving Flood Control District's board, aligning with broader efforts to promote efficiency and transparency in local governmental operations. However, some may express concerns regarding the sufficiency of three directors to represent the wider interests of the community effectively, hinting at a need for vigilant oversight.

Contention

A point of contention regarding HB 2173 could arise over the specific quorum requirement set at three members, which some may argue is too low for a board dealing with significant flood control operations. Additionally, while the validation of past actions aims to provide security, it may raise concerns among stakeholders regarding the transparency of those previously made decisions, especially if they were deemed contentious or were under scrutiny. The balance between efficient governance and accountability remains a key discussion point as the bill moves forward.