Texas 2015 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB2272 Engrossed / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            May 1, 2015      TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2272 by Raney (Relating to surety bond requirements for reserve deputy sheriffs.), As Engrossed    No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Local Government Code to authorize a sheriff to execute a blanket surety bond to cover more than one reserve deputy sheriff. The bill would also authorize a county to self-insure against losses instead of a reserve deputy sheriff executing an individual bond or a blanket surety bond. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:   LBB Staff:  UP, KJo, ESi, SD, EK    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 1, 2015





  TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2272 by Raney (Relating to surety bond requirements for reserve deputy sheriffs.), As Engrossed  

TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2272 by Raney (Relating to surety bond requirements for reserve deputy sheriffs.), As Engrossed

 Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice 

 Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB2272 by Raney (Relating to surety bond requirements for reserve deputy sheriffs.), As Engrossed

HB2272 by Raney (Relating to surety bond requirements for reserve deputy sheriffs.), As Engrossed



No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Local Government Code to authorize a sheriff to execute a blanket surety bond to cover more than one reserve deputy sheriff. The bill would also authorize a county to self-insure against losses instead of a reserve deputy sheriff executing an individual bond or a blanket surety bond.

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies:



LBB Staff: UP, KJo, ESi, SD, EK

 UP, KJo, ESi, SD, EK