LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 20, 2015 TO: Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB249 by Leach (Relating to the reporting of proceeds and property forfeited under criminal asset forfeiture proceedings.), As Introduced Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB249, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($861,983) through the biennium ending August 31, 2017. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 20, 2015
TO: Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB249 by Leach (Relating to the reporting of proceeds and property forfeited under criminal asset forfeiture proceedings.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB249 by Leach (Relating to the reporting of proceeds and property forfeited under criminal asset forfeiture proceedings.), As Introduced
Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB249 by Leach (Relating to the reporting of proceeds and property forfeited under criminal asset forfeiture proceedings.), As Introduced
HB249 by Leach (Relating to the reporting of proceeds and property forfeited under criminal asset forfeiture proceedings.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB249, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($861,983) through the biennium ending August 31, 2017. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB249, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($861,983) through the biennium ending August 31, 2017.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds 2016 ($704,850) 2017 ($157,133) 2018 ($157,133) 2019 ($157,133) 2020 ($157,133)
2016 ($704,850)
2017 ($157,133)
2018 ($157,133)
2019 ($157,133)
2020 ($157,133)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2015 2016 ($704,850) 1.5 2017 ($157,133) 1.5 2018 ($157,133) 1.5 2019 ($157,133) 1.5 2020 ($157,133) 1.5
Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2015 2016 ($704,850) 1.5 2017 ($157,133) 1.5 2018 ($157,133) 1.5 2019 ($157,133) 1.5 2020 ($157,133) 1.5
2016 ($704,850) 1.5
2017 ($157,133) 1.5
2018 ($157,133) 1.5
2019 ($157,133) 1.5
2020 ($157,133) 1.5
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to require all law enforcement agencies to produce an audit containing detailed information related to certain criminal asset forfeitures and provide this information to the Office of the Attorney General. The Office of the Attorney General would be required to publish a summary report of the audits on its website no later than February 1st each year. Under the bill provisions, the Office of the Attorney General indicated the fiscal impact would be $704,850 in fiscal year 2016 and $157,133 each fiscal year from 2017-2020. Costs include salaries for 1.5 FTEs, general operating, capital equipment, benefits, and one-time costs for information technology system development ($537,404). The Office of the Attorney General indicated that Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) requirements may apply to the information provided in the audits and summary reports under the bill provisions. According to the Office of the Attorney General, CJIS compliant software licenses would have a recurring fiscal year cost of $4,734,803. However, it cannot be determined if CJIS requirements would apply at this time. The Office of Court Administration indicated the costs associated with implementation of the bill could be absorbed with existing resources. The bill would take effect September 1, 2015.
Methodology
Currently, the Office of the Attorney General - Criminal Prosecutions Division receives paper reports on seized asset forfeitures from law enforcement entities and manually aggregates the data in Excel spreadsheets. The information provided by law enforcement entities is generally a single number providing a total amount of seized asset forfeitures. The Criminal Prosecutions Division anticipates the bill provision would require the audits provided by law enforcement entities to provide substantially more detailed information related to individual seizures and criminal charges. The Office of the Attorney General estimates the bill provisions would require one Legal Assistant IV (1.0 FTEs) and 0.5 Programmer V (0.5 FTEs) with a combined fiscal year cost of $138,795 for salaries ($103,671) and related benefits ($35,124). Additionally, the Office of the Attorney General estimates the bill provisions would require one-time information technology system development in order to accommodate the additional detail law enforcement entities would be required to provide.
Technology
There would be a technology impact related to computer hardware, software, telecommunications equipment, and network storage estimated to be $557,827 in fiscal year 2016 and $10,110 in subsequent fiscal years.
Local Government Impact
There may be administrative costs to local law enforcement agencies to comply with certain reporting requirements; however, no significant fiscal implication is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 302 Office of the Attorney General
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 302 Office of the Attorney General
LBB Staff: UP, KJo, EP, TBo, GDz, KVe
UP, KJo, EP, TBo, GDz, KVe