Texas 2015 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB2548 House Committee Report / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            May 7, 2015      TO: Honorable Tracy O. King, Chair, House Committee on Agriculture & Livestock      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2548 by Stephenson (relating to the disposal of pesticides.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted   Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2548, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2017. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. 

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 7, 2015





  TO: Honorable Tracy O. King, Chair, House Committee on Agriculture & Livestock      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2548 by Stephenson (relating to the disposal of pesticides.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted  

TO: Honorable Tracy O. King, Chair, House Committee on Agriculture & Livestock
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2548 by Stephenson (relating to the disposal of pesticides.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

 Honorable Tracy O. King, Chair, House Committee on Agriculture & Livestock 

 Honorable Tracy O. King, Chair, House Committee on Agriculture & Livestock 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB2548 by Stephenson (relating to the disposal of pesticides.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

HB2548 by Stephenson (relating to the disposal of pesticides.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2548, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2017. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. 

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2548, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2017.

The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact:  Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds  2016 $0   2017 $0   2018 $0   2019 $0   2020 $0    


2016 $0
2017 $0
2018 $0
2019 $0
2020 $0

 All Funds, Five-Year Impact:  Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain fromGeneral Revenue Fund1  Probable (Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1  Probable Revenue Gain fromNew Other - Pesticide Education and Disposal Fund Probable (Cost) fromNew Other - Pesticide Education and Disposal Fund   2016 $400,000 ($400,000) $400,000 ($400,000)   2017 $400,000 ($400,000) $400,000 ($400,000)   2018 $400,000 ($400,000) $400,000 ($400,000)   2019 $400,000 ($400,000) $400,000 ($400,000)   2020 $400,000 ($400,000) $400,000 ($400,000)   

  Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain fromGeneral Revenue Fund1  Probable (Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1  Probable Revenue Gain fromNew Other - Pesticide Education and Disposal Fund Probable (Cost) fromNew Other - Pesticide Education and Disposal Fund   2016 $400,000 ($400,000) $400,000 ($400,000)   2017 $400,000 ($400,000) $400,000 ($400,000)   2018 $400,000 ($400,000) $400,000 ($400,000)   2019 $400,000 ($400,000) $400,000 ($400,000)   2020 $400,000 ($400,000) $400,000 ($400,000)  


2016 $400,000 ($400,000) $400,000 ($400,000)
2017 $400,000 ($400,000) $400,000 ($400,000)
2018 $400,000 ($400,000) $400,000 ($400,000)
2019 $400,000 ($400,000) $400,000 ($400,000)
2020 $400,000 ($400,000) $400,000 ($400,000)

Fiscal Analysis

The bill would amend the Agriculture Code, regarding pesticide and herbicide regulation. The bill would create the Pesticide Education and Disposal Fund in the state treasury outside of the General Revenue Fund. The fund would consist of revenue from annual transfers of pesticide registration fees collected under Section 76.044 in amounts, not to exceed $400,000, as determined by the Texas Department of Agriculture (TDA) to be necessary to administer pesticide waste and container collection activities.  Interest earnings from money in the fund would be deposited to the credit of the fund. The fund would be administered by TDA and could be appropriated only for pesticide waste and container collection activities. TDA would coordinate pesticide disposal efforts with the Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, including contracting for disposal services.This legislation would do one or more of the following: create or recreate a dedicated account in the General Revenue Fund, create or recreate a special or trust fund either with or outside of the Treasury, or create a dedicated revenue source. The fund, account, or revenue dedication included in this bill would be subject to funds consolidation review by the current Legislature. The bill would take effect September 1, 2015.

Methodology

 Revenue Gains, Losses and Offsetting Gains: TDA indicates that should the agency transfer up to $400,000 of the pesticide product registration fees from General Revenue to the new fund for an education and disposal program, the transfer may result in the agency raising fees to cover funding a portion of its current duties for pesticide regulation.  Accordingly, in this analysis it is assumed the cost of transferring General Revenue would be offset by an increase in registration fees. Costs for the pesticide education and disposal program are assumed to be equal to the amount transferred each fiscal year. Amounts in this analysis assume the statutory maximum would be transferred. Out of this amount, both TDA and the AgriLife Extension Service are expected to have minimal administrative costs to implement bill provisions.

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 551 Department of Agriculture, 555 Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service

304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 551 Department of Agriculture, 555 Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service

LBB Staff: UP, TB, SZ, MW

 UP, TB, SZ, MW