Texas 2015 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB2804 Senate Committee Report / Bill

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    By: Aycock, Meyer H.B. No. 2804
 (Senate Sponsor - Taylor of Galveston)
 (In the Senate - Received from the House May 18, 2015;
 May 18, 2015, read first time and referred to Committee on
 Education; May 22, 2015, reported adversely, with favorable
 Committee Substitute by the following vote:  Yeas 10, Nays 0;
 May 22, 2015, sent to printer.)
Click here to see the committee vote
 COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR H.B. No. 2804 By:  Taylor of Galveston


 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to evaluation of public school performance.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1.  The heading to Section 39.053, Education Code,
 is amended to read as follows:
 Sec. 39.053.  PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: [STUDENT]
 ACHIEVEMENT.
 SECTION 2.  Section 39.053, Education Code, is amended by
 amending Subsections (a), (b), (c), (f), (g), and (g-1) and adding
 Subsection (a-1) to read as follows:
 (a)  The commissioner shall adopt a set of indicators of the
 quality of learning and [student] achievement.  The commissioner
 biennially shall review the indicators for the consideration of
 appropriate revisions.
 (a-1)  The indicators adopted by the commissioner under
 Subsection (a), including the indicators identified under
 Subsection (c), must measure and evaluate school districts and
 campuses with respect to:
 (1)  improving student preparedness for success in:
 (A)  subsequent grade levels; and
 (B)  entering the workforce, the military, or
 postsecondary education;
 (2)  reducing, with the goal of eliminating, student
 academic achievement differentials among students from different
 racial and ethnic groups and socioeconomic backgrounds; and
 (3)  informing parents and the community regarding
 campus and district performance in the domains described by
 Subsection (c) and, for the domain described by Subsection (c)(5),
 in accordance with local priorities and preferences.
 (b)  Performance on the [student] achievement indicators
 adopted under Subsections (c)(1)-(4) [this section] shall be
 compared to state-established standards.  The indicators must be
 based on information that is disaggregated by race, ethnicity, and
 socioeconomic status.
 (c)  School districts and campuses must be evaluated based on
 five domains of indicators [Indicators] of [student] achievement
 adopted under this section that [must] include:
 (1)  in the first domain, the results of:
 (A)  assessment instruments required under
 Sections 39.023(a), (c), and (l), including the results of
 assessment instruments required for graduation retaken by a
 student, aggregated across grade levels by subject area, including:
 (i)  [(A)]  for the performance standard
 determined by the commissioner under Section 39.0241(a),[:
 [(i)]  the percentage of students who
 performed satisfactorily on the assessment instruments, aggregated
 across grade levels by subject area; and
 (ii)  [for students who did not perform
 satisfactorily, the percentage of students who met the standard for
 annual improvement, as determined by the agency under Section
 39.034, on the assessment instruments, aggregated across grade
 levels by subject area; and
 [(B)]  for the college readiness performance
 standard as determined under Section 39.0241,[:
 [(i)] the percentage of students who
 performed satisfactorily on the assessment instruments, aggregated
 across grade levels by subject area; and
 (B)  assessment instruments required under
 Section 39.023(b), aggregated across grade levels by subject area,
 including the percentage of students who performed satisfactorily
 on the assessment instruments, as determined by the performance
 standard adopted by the agency, aggregated across grade levels by
 subject area;
 (2)  in the second domain:
 (A)  for assessment instruments under Subdivision
 (1)(A):
 (i)  for the performance standard determined
 by the commissioner under Section 39.0241(a), the percentage of
 students who met the standard for annual improvement on the
 assessment instruments, as determined by the commissioner by rule
 or by the method for measuring annual improvement under Section
 39.034, aggregated across grade levels by subject area; and
 (ii)  for the college readiness performance
 standard as determined under Section 39.0241, the percentage of
 students who met the standard for annual improvement on the
 assessment instruments, as determined by the commissioner by rule
 or by the method for measuring annual improvement under Section
 39.034, aggregated across grade levels by subject area; and
 (B)  for assessment instruments under Subdivision
 (1)(B), the percentage of students who met the standard for annual
 improvement on the assessment instruments, as determined by the
 commissioner by rule or by the method for measuring annual
 improvement under Section 39.034, aggregated across grade levels by
 subject area;
 (3)  in the third domain, the student academic
 achievement differentials among students from different racial and
 ethnic groups and socioeconomic backgrounds;
 (4)  in the fourth domain:
 (A)  for evaluating the performance of high school
 campuses and districts that include high school campuses:
 (i)  [(ii) for students who did not perform
 satisfactorily, the percentage of students who met the standard for
 annual improvement, as determined by the agency under Section
 39.034, on the assessment instruments, aggregated across grade
 levels by subject area;
 [(2)]  dropout rates, including dropout rates and
 district completion rates for grade levels 9 through 12, computed
 in accordance with standards and definitions adopted by the
 National Center for Education Statistics of the United States
 Department of Education;
 (ii) [(3)]  high school graduation rates,
 computed in accordance with standards and definitions adopted in
 compliance with the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (20 U.S.C.
 Section 6301 et seq.);
 (iii) [(4)]  the percentage of students who
 successfully completed the curriculum requirements for the
 distinguished level of achievement under the foundation high school
 program;
 (iv) [(5)]  the percentage of students who
 successfully completed the curriculum requirements for an
 endorsement under Section 28.025(c-1); [and]
 (v)  the percentage of students who
 completed a coherent sequence of career and technical courses;
 (vi) [(6)     at least three additional
 indicators of student achievement to evaluate district and campus
 performance, which must include either:
 [(A)]  the percentage of students who satisfy the
 Texas Success Initiative (TSI) college readiness benchmarks
 prescribed by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board under
 Section 51.3062(f) on an assessment instrument in reading, writing,
 or mathematics designated by the Texas Higher Education
 Coordinating Board under Section 51.3062(c); [or]
 (vii) [(B)]  the percentage [number] of
 students who earn[:
 [(i)]  at least 12 hours of postsecondary
 credit required for the foundation high school program under
 Section 28.025 or to earn an endorsement under Section 28.025(c-1);
 (viii)  the percentage of students who have
 completed an advanced placement course;
 (ix)  the percentage of students who enlist
 in the armed forces of the United States; and
 (x)  the percentage of students who earn
 [(ii)     at least 30 hours of postsecondary credit required for the
 foundation high school program under Section 28.025 or to earn an
 endorsement under Section 28.025(c-1);
 [(iii)  an associate's degree; or
 [(iv)]  an industry certification;
 (B)  for evaluating the performance of middle and
 junior high school and elementary school campuses and districts
 that include those campuses:
 (i)  student attendance; and
 (ii)  for middle and junior high school
 campuses:
 (a)  dropout rates, computed in the
 manner described by Paragraph (A)(i); and
 (b)  the percentage of students in
 grades seven and eight who receive instruction in preparing for
 high school, college, and a career that includes information
 regarding  the creation of a high school personal graduation plan
 under Section 28.02121, the distinguished level of achievement
 described by Section 28.025(b-15), each endorsement described by
 Section 28.025(c-1), college readiness standards, and potential
 career choices and the education needed to enter those careers; and
 (C)  any additional indicators of student
 achievement not associated with performance on standardized
 assessment instruments determined appropriate for consideration by
 the commissioner in consultation with educators, parents, business
 and industry representatives, and employers; and
 (5)  in the fifth domain, three programs or specific
 categories of performance related to community and student
 engagement locally selected and evaluated as provided by Section
 39.0546.
 (f)  Annually, the commissioner shall define the state
 standard for the current school year for each [student] achievement
 indicator described by Subsections (c)(1)-(4) [Subsection (c)] and
 shall project the state standards for each indicator for the
 following two school years.  The commissioner shall periodically
 raise the state standards for the college readiness [student]
 achievement indicator described by Subsection (c)(1)(A)(ii)
 [(c)(1)(B)(i)] for accreditation as necessary to reach the goals of
 achieving, by not later than the 2019-2020 school year:
 (1)  student performance in this state, disaggregated
 by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, that ranks nationally
 in the top 10 states in terms of college readiness; and
 (2)  student performance[,] with no significant
 achievement gaps by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.
 (g)  In defining the required state standard for the dropout
 rate indicator described by Subsections (c)(4)(A)(i) and
 (B)(ii)(a) [Subsection (c)(2)], the commissioner may not consider
 as a dropout a student whose failure to attend school results from:
 (1)  the student's expulsion under Section 37.007; and
 (2)  as applicable:
 (A)  adjudication as having engaged in delinquent
 conduct or conduct indicating a need for supervision, as defined by
 Section 51.03, Family Code; or
 (B)  conviction of and sentencing for an offense
 under the Penal Code.
 (g-1)  In computing dropout and completion rates under
 Subsections (c)(4)(A)(i) and (B)(ii)(a) [Subsection (c)(2)], the
 commissioner shall exclude:
 (1)  students who are ordered by a court to attend a
 high school equivalency certificate program but who have not yet
 earned a high school equivalency certificate;
 (2)  students who were previously reported to the state
 as dropouts, including a student who is reported as a dropout,
 reenrolls, and drops out again, regardless of the number of times of
 reenrollment and dropping out;
 (3)  students in attendance who are not in membership
 for purposes of average daily attendance;
 (4)  students whose initial enrollment in a school in
 the United States in grades 7 through 12 was as unschooled refugees
 or asylees as defined by Section 39.027(a-1);
 (5)  students who are in the district exclusively as a
 function of having been detained at a county detention facility but
 are otherwise not students of the district in which the facility is
 located; and
 (6)  students who are incarcerated in state jails and
 federal penitentiaries as adults and as persons certified to stand
 trial as adults.
 SECTION 3.  Effective September 1, 2015, Subchapter C,
 Chapter 39, Education Code, is amended by adding Section 39.0535 to
 read as follows:
 Sec. 39.0535.  TEMPORARY PROVISION: ASSIGNMENT OF
 PERFORMANCE RATINGS. (a) Notwithstanding any other law, the
 commissioner shall assign each district and campus a performance
 rating not later than August 15 of each year.
 (b)  This section expires September 1, 2016.
 SECTION 4.  Effective September 1, 2016, Section 39.054(a),
 Education Code, is amended to read as follows:
 (a)  The commissioner shall adopt rules to evaluate school
 district and campus performance and assign each district and campus
 a performance rating [of A, B, C, D, or F]. In adopting rules under
 this subsection, the commissioner shall determine the criteria for
 each [designated letter] performance rating. [A district
 performance rating of A, B, or C reflects acceptable performance
 and a district performance rating of D or F reflects unacceptable
 performance. The commissioner shall also assign each campus a
 performance rating of exemplary, recognized, acceptable, or
 unacceptable. A campus performance rating of exemplary,
 recognized, or acceptable reflects acceptable performance, and a
 campus performance rating of unacceptable reflects unacceptable
 performance. A district may not receive a performance rating of A
 if the district includes any campus with a performance rating of
 unacceptable.] Not later than August 15 [8] of each year, the
 performance rating of each district and campus shall be made
 publicly available as provided by rules adopted under this
 subsection. If a district or campus received a performance rating
 that reflected unacceptable performance for the preceding school
 year, the commissioner shall notify the district of a subsequent
 such designation on or before June 15.
 SECTION 5.  Effective September 1, 2017, Section 39.054,
 Education Code, is amended by amending Subsections (a), (c), (e),
 and (f) and adding Subsections (a-1), (a-2), and (a-3) to read as
 follows:
 (a)  The commissioner shall adopt rules to evaluate school
 district and campus performance and assign each district and campus
 an overall [a] performance rating of A, B, C, D, or F. In addition to
 the overall performance rating, the commissioner shall assign each
 district and campus a separate domain performance rating of A, B, C,
 D, or F for each domain under Sections 39.053(c)(1)-(4).  An overall
 or domain [In adopting rules under this subsection, the
 commissioner shall determine the criteria for each designated
 letter performance rating.    A district] performance rating of A
 reflects exemplary performance. An overall or domain performance
 rating of B reflects recognized performance. An overall or domain
 performance rating of [, B, or] C reflects acceptable performance.
 An overall or domain [and a district] performance rating of D or F
 reflects unacceptable performance. [The commissioner shall also
 assign each campus a performance rating of exemplary, recognized,
 acceptable, or unacceptable. A campus performance rating of
 exemplary, recognized, or acceptable reflects acceptable
 performance, and a campus performance rating of unacceptable
 reflects unacceptable performance.]  A district may not receive an
 overall or domain [a] performance rating of A if the district
 includes any campus with a corresponding overall or domain
 performance rating of D or F [unacceptable]. A reference in law to
 an acceptable rating or acceptable performance includes an overall
 or domain performance rating of A, B, or C or exemplary, recognized,
 or acceptable performance.
 (a-1)  For purposes of assigning an overall performance
 rating under Subsection (a), the commissioner shall attribute:
 (1)  55 percent of the performance evaluation to the
 achievement indicators for the first, second, and third domains
 under Sections 39.053(c)(1)-(3);
 (2)  for middle and junior high school and elementary
 campuses and districts that include only those campuses, 35 percent
 of the performance evaluation to the applicable achievement
 indicators for the fourth domain under Section 39.053(c)(4);
 (3)  for high school campuses and districts that
 include those campuses:
 (A)  20 percent of the performance evaluation to
 the high school graduation rate achievement indicator described by
 Section 39.053(c)(4)(A)(ii); and
 (B)  15 percent to the remaining applicable
 achievement indicators for the fourth domain under Section
 39.053(c)(4); and
 (4)  10 percent of the performance evaluation to the
 locally selected and evaluated achievement indicators provided for
 under the fifth domain under Section 39.053(c)(5).
 (a-2)  The commissioner by rule shall adopt procedures to
 ensure that a repeated performance rating of D or F or unacceptable
 in one domain, particularly performance that is not significantly
 improving, is reflected in the overall performance rating of a
 district or campus and is not compensated for by a performance
 rating of A, B, or C in another domain.
 (a-3)  Not later than August 15 [8] of each year, the
 performance ratings [rating] of each district and campus shall be
 made publicly available as provided by rules adopted under this
 section [subsection].  If a district or campus received an overall
 or domain [a] performance rating of D or F [that reflected
 unacceptable performance] for the preceding school year, the
 commissioner shall notify the district of a subsequent such
 designation on or before June 15.
 (c)  In evaluating school district and campus performance on
 the [student] achievement indicators for student performance on
 assessment instruments [indicators] adopted under Sections
 39.053(c)(1) and (2) and the dropout rate indicator adopted under
 Sections 39.053(c)(4)(A)(i) and (B)(ii)(a), the commissioner shall
 define acceptable performance as meeting the state standard
 determined by the commissioner under Section 39.053(f) [39.053(e)]
 for the current school year based on:
 (1)  student performance in the current school year; or
 (2)  student performance as averaged over the current
 school year and the preceding two school years.
 (e)  Each annual performance review under this section shall
 include an analysis of the [student] achievement indicators adopted
 under Sections 39.053(c)(1)-(4) [Section 39.053(c)] to determine
 school district and campus performance in relation to[:
 [(1)]  standards established for each indicator[; and
 [(2)     required improvement as defined under Section
 39.053(e)].
 (f)  In the computation of dropout rates under Sections
 39.053(c)(4)(A)(i) and (B)(ii)(a) [Section 39.053(c)(2)], a
 student who is released from a juvenile pre-adjudication secure
 detention facility or juvenile post-adjudication secure
 correctional facility and fails to enroll in school or a student who
 leaves a residential treatment center after receiving treatment for
 fewer than 85 days and fails to enroll in school may not be
 considered to have dropped out from the school district or campus
 serving the facility or center unless that district or campus is the
 one to which the student is regularly assigned.  The agency may not
 limit an appeal relating to dropout computations under this
 subsection.
 SECTION 6.  Sections 39.0545(b), (c), and (d), Education
 Code, as added by Chapter 167 (S.B. 1538), Acts of the 83rd
 Legislature, Regular Session, 2013, are amended to read as follows:
 (b)  Notwithstanding Section 39.053(c)(4)(A)(i)
 [39.053(c)(2)], the commissioner shall use the alternative
 completion rate under this subsection to determine the dropout rate
 [student achievement] indicator under Section 39.053(c)(4)(A)(i)
 [39.053(c)(2)] for a dropout recovery school.  The alternative
 completion rate shall be the ratio of the total number of students
 who graduate, continue attending school into the next academic
 year, or receive a high school equivalency certificate to the total
 number of students in the longitudinal cohort of students.
 (c)  Notwithstanding Section 39.053(c)(4)(A)(i)
 [39.053(c)(2)], in determining the performance rating under
 Section 39.054 of a dropout recovery school, the commissioner shall
 include any student described by Section 39.053(g-1) who graduates
 or receives a high school equivalency certificate.
 (d)  Notwithstanding Section 39.053(c), for purposes of
 evaluating [For] a dropout recovery school under the accountability
 procedures adopted by the commissioner to determine the performance
 rating of the school under Section 39.054:
 (1)[,] only the best result from the primary
 administration or [and] any retake of an assessment instrument
 administered to a student in the school year evaluated [under the
 accountability procedures adopted by the commissioner] may be
 considered; and
 (2)  only a student enrolled continuously for at least
 90 days during the school year evaluated may be considered [in
 determining the performance rating of the school under Section
 39.054].
 SECTION 7.  Subchapter C, Chapter 39, Education Code, is
 amended by adding Section 39.0546 to read as follows:
 Sec. 39.0546.  PERFORMANCE IN COMMUNITY AND STUDENT
 ENGAGEMENT AS COMPONENT OF OVERALL DISTRICT AND CAMPUS RATING. (a)
 For purposes of including the local evaluation of districts and
 campuses under Section 39.053(c)(5) and assigning an overall rating
 under Section 39.054, before the beginning of each school year:
 (1)  each school district shall:
 (A)  select and report to the agency three
 programs or categories under Section 39.0545(b)(1), as added by
 Chapter 211 (H.B. 5), Acts of the 83rd Legislature, Regular
 Session, 2013, under which the district will evaluate district
 performance;
 (B)  submit to the agency the criteria the
 district will use to evaluate district performance and assign the
 district a performance rating; and
 (C)  make the information described by Paragraphs
 (A) and (B) available on the district's Internet website; and
 (2)  each campus shall:
 (A)  select and report to the agency three
 programs or categories under Section 39.0545(b)(1), as added by
 Chapter 211 (H.B. 5), Acts of the 83rd Legislature, Regular
 Session, 2013, under which the campus will evaluate campus
 performance;
 (B)  submit to the agency the criteria the campus
 will use to evaluate campus performance and assign the campus a
 performance rating; and
 (C)  make the information described by Paragraphs
 (A) and (B) available on the Internet website of the campus.
 (b)  Based on the evaluation under this section, each school
 district shall assign the district and each campus shall assign the
 campus a performance rating of A, B, C, D, or F, for both overall
 performance and for each program or category evaluated.  An overall
 or a program or category performance rating of A reflects exemplary
 performance. An overall or a program or category performance rating
 of B reflects recognized performance. An overall or a program or
 category performance rating of C reflects acceptable performance.
 An overall or a program or category performance rating of D or F
 reflects unacceptable performance.
 (c)  On or before the date determined by the commissioner by
 rule, each school district and campus shall report each performance
 rating to the agency for the purpose of including the rating in
 evaluating school district and campus performance and assigning an
 overall rating under Section 39.054.
 SECTION 8.  Chapter 39, Education Code, is amended by adding
 Subchapter N to read as follows:
 SUBCHAPTER N. TEXAS COMMISSION ON NEXT GENERATION ASSESSMENTS AND
 ACCOUNTABILITY
 Sec. 39.501.  DEFINITION. In this subchapter, "commission"
 means the Texas Commission on Next Generation Assessments and
 Accountability.
 Sec. 39.502.  TEXAS COMMISSION ON NEXT GENERATION
 ASSESSMENTS AND ACCOUNTABILITY. (a)  The Texas Commission on Next
 Generation Assessments and Accountability is established to
 develop and make recommendations for new systems of student
 assessment and public school accountability.
 (b)  The commission is composed of 15 members, consisting of
 the following:
 (1)  four members appointed by the governor;
 (2)  three members appointed by the lieutenant
 governor;
 (3)  three members appointed by the speaker of the
 house of representatives;
 (4)  the chair of the senate committee on education, or
 a representative designated by the chair;
 (5)  the chair of the senate committee on higher
 education, or a representative designated by the chair;
 (6)  the chair of the house of representatives
 committee on public education, or a representative designated by
 the chair;
 (7)  the chair of the house of representatives
 committee on higher education, or a representative designated by
 the chair; and
 (8)  a member of the State Board of Education, as
 designated by the chair of that board.
 (c)  In making appointments under Subsections (b)(1), (2),
 and (3), the governor, lieutenant governor, and speaker of the
 house of representatives shall coordinate to ensure that the
 commission includes at least one of each of the following
 representatives:
 (1)  a parent or person standing in parental relation
 to a student enrolled in the public school system;
 (2)  an educator in the public school system;
 (3)  an educator in a school district that is a
 participant in the Texas High Performance Schools Consortium under
 Section 7.0561;
 (4)  a member of the business community;
 (5)  a member of the civic community;
 (6)  a leader in student assessment development and
 use; and
 (7)  a leader in research concerning student assessment
 and education outcomes.
 Sec. 39.503.  PRESIDING OFFICER. The governor shall
 designate the presiding officer of the commission.
 Sec. 39.504.  COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT. A member of
 the commission is not entitled to compensation for service on the
 commission but is entitled to reimbursement for actual and
 necessary expenses incurred in performing commission duties.
 Sec. 39.505.  ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT AND FUNDING.
 (a)  Staff members of the agency shall provide administrative
 support for the commission.
 (b)  Funding for the administrative and operational expenses
 of the commission shall be provided by appropriation to the agency
 for that purpose.
 Sec. 39.506.  RECOMMENDATIONS. The commission shall develop
 recommendations under this subchapter to address:
 (1)  the purpose of a state accountability system and
 the role of student assessment in that system;
 (2)  opportunities to assess students that:
 (A)  provide actionable information for a parent
 or person standing in parental relation to a student, an educator,
 and the public;
 (B)  support learning activities;
 (C)  recognize application of skills and
 knowledge;
 (D)  measure student educational growth toward
 mastery; and
 (E)  value critical thinking;
 (3)  alignment of state performance standards with
 college and career readiness requirements in collaboration with the
 Texas Workforce Commission and Texas Higher Education Coordinating
 Board;
 (4)  policy changes necessary to enable a student to
 progress through subject matter and grade levels on demonstration
 of mastery; and
 (5)  policy changes necessary to establish a student
 assessment and public school accountability system that meets state
 goals, is community based, promotes parent and community
 involvement, and reflects the unique needs of each community.
 Sec. 39.507.  REPORT. (a)  The commission shall prepare and
 deliver a report to the governor and the legislature that
 recommends statutory changes to improve systems of student
 assessment and public school accountability not later than
 September 1, 2016.
 (b)  In preparing the report, the commission shall consider
 the recommendations of the Texas High Performance Schools
 Consortium established under Section 7.0561, including
 recommendations related to innovative, next-generation learning
 standards and assessment and accountability systems.
 Sec. 39.508.  PUBLIC MEETINGS AND PUBLIC INFORMATION.
 (a)  The commission may hold public meetings as needed to fulfill
 its duties under this subchapter.
 (b)  The commission is subject to Chapters 551 and 552,
 Government Code.
 Sec. 39.509.  COMMISSION ABOLISHED; EXPIRATION OF
 SUBCHAPTER.  (a)  The commission is abolished January 1, 2017.
 (b)  This subchapter expires January 1, 2017.
 SECTION 9.  Section 11.252(a), Education Code, is amended to
 read as follows:
 (a)  Each school district shall have a district improvement
 plan that is developed, evaluated, and revised annually, in
 accordance with district policy, by the superintendent with the
 assistance of the district-level committee established under
 Section 11.251.  The purpose of the district improvement plan is to
 guide district and campus staff in the improvement of student
 performance for all student groups in order to attain state
 standards in respect to the [student] achievement indicators
 adopted under Sections 39.053(c)(1)-(4) [Section 39.053].  The
 district improvement plan must include provisions for:
 (1)  a comprehensive needs assessment addressing
 district student performance on the [student] achievement
 indicators, and other appropriate measures of performance, that are
 disaggregated by all student groups served by the district,
 including categories of ethnicity, socioeconomic status, sex, and
 populations served by special programs, including students in
 special education programs under Subchapter A, Chapter 29;
 (2)  measurable district performance objectives for
 all appropriate [student] achievement indicators for all student
 populations, including students in special education programs
 under Subchapter A, Chapter 29, and other measures of student
 performance that may be identified through the comprehensive needs
 assessment;
 (3)  strategies for improvement of student performance
 that include:
 (A)  instructional methods for addressing the
 needs of student groups not achieving their full potential;
 (B)  methods for addressing the needs of students
 for special programs, including:
 (i)  suicide prevention programs, in
 accordance with Subchapter O-1, Chapter 161, Health and Safety
 Code, which includes a parental or guardian notification procedure;
 (ii)  conflict resolution programs;
 (iii)  violence prevention programs; and
 (iv)  dyslexia treatment programs;
 (C)  dropout reduction;
 (D)  integration of technology in instructional
 and administrative programs;
 (E)  discipline management;
 (F)  staff development for professional staff of
 the district;
 (G)  career education to assist students in
 developing the knowledge, skills, and competencies necessary for a
 broad range of career opportunities; and
 (H)  accelerated education;
 (4)  strategies for providing to middle school, junior
 high school, and high school students, those students' teachers and
 school counselors, and those students' parents information about:
 (A)  higher education admissions and financial
 aid opportunities;
 (B)  the TEXAS grant program and the Teach for
 Texas grant program established under Chapter 56;
 (C)  the need for students to make informed
 curriculum choices to be prepared for success beyond high school;
 and
 (D)  sources of information on higher education
 admissions and financial aid;
 (5)  resources needed to implement identified
 strategies;
 (6)  staff responsible for ensuring the accomplishment
 of each strategy;
 (7)  timelines for ongoing monitoring of the
 implementation of each improvement strategy;
 (8)  formative evaluation criteria for determining
 periodically whether strategies are resulting in intended
 improvement of student performance; and
 (9)  the policy under Section 38.0041 addressing sexual
 abuse and other maltreatment of children.
 SECTION 10.  Sections 11.253(c) and (d), Education Code, are
 amended to read as follows:
 (c)  Each school year, the principal of each school campus,
 with the assistance of the campus-level committee, shall develop,
 review, and revise the campus improvement plan for the purpose of
 improving student performance for all student populations,
 including students in special education programs under Subchapter
 A, Chapter 29, with respect to the [student] achievement indicators
 adopted under Sections 39.053(c)(1)-(4) [Section 39.053] and any
 other appropriate performance measures for special needs
 populations.
 (d)  Each campus improvement plan must:
 (1)  assess the academic achievement for each student
 in the school using the [student] achievement indicator system as
 described by Section 39.053;
 (2)  set the campus performance objectives based on the
 [student] achievement indicator system, including objectives for
 special needs populations, including students in special education
 programs under Subchapter A, Chapter 29;
 (3)  identify how the campus goals will be met for each
 student;
 (4)  determine the resources needed to implement the
 plan;
 (5)  identify staff needed to implement the plan;
 (6)  set timelines for reaching the goals;
 (7)  measure progress toward the performance
 objectives periodically to ensure that the plan is resulting in
 academic improvement;
 (8)  include goals and methods for violence prevention
 and intervention on campus;
 (9)  provide for a program to encourage parental
 involvement at the campus; and
 (10)  if the campus is an elementary, middle, or junior
 high school, set goals and objectives for the coordinated health
 program at the campus based on:
 (A)  student fitness assessment data, including
 any data from research-based assessments such as the school health
 index assessment and planning tool created by the federal Centers
 for Disease Control and Prevention;
 (B)  student academic performance data;
 (C)  student attendance rates;
 (D)  the percentage of students who are
 educationally disadvantaged;
 (E)  the use and success of any method to ensure
 that students participate in moderate to vigorous physical activity
 as required by Section 28.002(l); and
 (F)  any other indicator recommended by the local
 school health advisory council.
 SECTION 11.  Section 12.1013(c), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (c)  The report must include the performance of each public
 school in each class described by Subsection (b) as measured by the
 [student] achievement indicators adopted under Sections
 39.053(c)(1)-(4) [Section 39.053] and student attrition rates.
 SECTION 12.  Section 29.062(a), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (a)  The legislature recognizes that compliance with this
 subchapter is an imperative public necessity.  Therefore, in
 accordance with the policy of the state, the agency shall evaluate
 the effectiveness of programs under this subchapter based on the
 [student] achievement indicators adopted under Sections
 39.053(c)(1)-(4) [Section 39.053], including the results of
 assessment instruments.  The agency may combine evaluations under
 this section with federal accountability measures concerning
 students of limited English proficiency.
 SECTION 13.  Section 39.023(a-8), Education Code, as
 effective on or before September 1, 2015, is amended to read as
 follows:
 (a-8)  A school district or open-enrollment charter school
 may, for its own use in determining whether students are performing
 at a satisfactory level, administer to a student at the appropriate
 grade level, other than a student required to be assessed, an
 assessment instrument developed for purposes of Subsection (a-4),
 (a-5), or (a-6).  At the request of a district or open-enrollment
 charter school, the agency shall provide, allow for the
 administration of, and score each assessment instrument
 administered under this subsection in the same manner and at the
 same cost as for assessment instruments required to be administered
 under the applicable subsection.  The results of an assessment
 instrument administered under this subsection may not be included
 as an indicator of [student] achievement under Section 39.053 or
 any other provision.
 SECTION 14.  Section 39.052(b), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (b)  In determining the accreditation status of a school
 district, the commissioner:
 (1)  shall evaluate and consider:
 (A)  performance on [student] achievement
 indicators described by Section 39.053(c); and
 (B)  performance under the financial
 accountability rating system developed under Subchapter D; and
 (2)  may evaluate and consider:
 (A)  the district's compliance with statutory
 requirements and requirements imposed by rule of the commissioner
 or State Board of Education under specific statutory authority that
 relate to:
 (i)  reporting data through the Public
 Education Information Management System (PEIMS) or other reports
 required by state or federal law or court order;
 (ii)  the high school graduation
 requirements under Section 28.025; or
 (iii)  an item listed under Sections
 7.056(e)(3)(C)-(I) that applies to the district;
 (B)  the effectiveness of the district's programs
 for special populations; and
 (C)  the effectiveness of the district's career
 and technology program.
 SECTION 15.  Section 39.055, Education Code, is amended to
 read as follows:
 Sec. 39.055.  STUDENT ORDERED BY A JUVENILE COURT OR STUDENT
 IN RESIDENTIAL FACILITY NOT CONSIDERED FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
 PURPOSES.  Notwithstanding any other provision of this code except
 to the extent otherwise provided under Section 39.054(f), for
 purposes of determining the performance of a school district,
 campus, or open-enrollment charter school under this chapter, a
 student ordered by a juvenile court into a residential program or
 facility operated by or under contract with the Texas Juvenile
 Justice Department, a juvenile board, or any other governmental
 entity or any student who is receiving treatment in a residential
 facility is not considered to be a student of the school district in
 which the program or facility is physically located or of an
 open-enrollment charter school, as applicable.  The performance of
 such a student on an assessment instrument or other [student]
 achievement indicator adopted under Section 39.053 or reporting
 indicator adopted under Section 39.301 shall be determined,
 reported, and considered separately from the performance of
 students attending a school of the district in which the program or
 facility is physically located or an open-enrollment charter
 school, as applicable.
 SECTION 16.  Section 39.056(b), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (b)  The commissioner shall determine the frequency of
 on-site investigations by the agency according to annual
 comprehensive analyses of student performance and equity in
 relation to the [student] achievement indicators adopted under
 Section 39.053.
 SECTION 17.  Section 39.102(a), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (a)  If a school district does not satisfy the accreditation
 criteria under Section 39.052, the academic performance standards
 under Section 39.053 or 39.054, or any financial accountability
 standard as determined by commissioner rule, the commissioner shall
 take any of the following actions to the extent the commissioner
 determines necessary:
 (1)  issue public notice of the deficiency to the board
 of trustees;
 (2)  order a hearing conducted by the board of trustees
 of the district for the purpose of notifying the public of the
 insufficient performance, the improvements in performance expected
 by the agency, and the interventions and sanctions that may be
 imposed under this section if the performance does not improve;
 (3)  order the preparation of a student achievement
 improvement plan that addresses each academic [student]
 achievement indicator under Section 39.053(c) for which the
 district's performance is insufficient, the submission of the plan
 to the commissioner for approval, and implementation of the plan;
 (4)  order a hearing to be held before the commissioner
 or the commissioner's designee at which the president of the board
 of trustees of the district and the superintendent shall appear and
 explain the district's low performance, lack of improvement, and
 plans for improvement;
 (5)  arrange an on-site investigation of the district;
 (6)  appoint an agency monitor to participate in and
 report to the agency on the activities of the board of trustees or
 the superintendent;
 (7)  appoint a conservator to oversee the operations of
 the district;
 (8)  appoint a management team to direct the operations
 of the district in areas of insufficient performance or require the
 district to obtain certain services under a contract with another
 person;
 (9)  if a district has a current accreditation status
 of accredited-warned or accredited-probation, fails to satisfy any
 standard under Section 39.054(e), or fails to satisfy financial
 accountability standards as determined by commissioner rule,
 appoint a board of managers to exercise the powers and duties of the
 board of trustees;
 (10)  if for two consecutive school years, including
 the current school year, a district has received an accreditation
 status of accredited-warned or accredited-probation, has failed to
 satisfy any standard under Section 39.054(e), or has failed to
 satisfy financial accountability standards as determined by
 commissioner rule, revoke the district's accreditation and:
 (A)  order closure of the district and annex the
 district to one or more adjoining districts under Section 13.054;
 or
 (B)  in the case of a home-rule school district or
 open-enrollment charter school, order closure of all programs
 operated under the district's or school's charter; or
 (11)  if a district has failed to satisfy any standard
 under Section 39.054(e) due to the district's dropout rates, impose
 sanctions designed to improve high school completion rates,
 including:
 (A)  ordering the development of a dropout
 prevention plan for approval by the commissioner;
 (B)  restructuring the district or appropriate
 school campuses to improve identification of and service to
 students who are at risk of dropping out of school, as defined by
 Section 29.081;
 (C)  ordering lower student-to-counselor ratios
 on school campuses with high dropout rates; and
 (D)  ordering the use of any other intervention
 strategy effective in reducing dropout rates, including mentor
 programs and flexible class scheduling.
 SECTION 18.  Section 39.263(a), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (a)  The criteria that the commissioner shall use to select
 successful schools and districts must be related to the goals in
 Section 4.002 and must include consideration of performance on the
 [student] achievement indicators adopted under Section 39.053(c)
 and consideration of the distinction designation criteria
 prescribed by or developed under Subchapter G.
 SECTION 19.  Section 39.301(b), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (b)  Performance on the indicators adopted under this
 section shall be evaluated in the same manner provided for
 evaluation of the [student] achievement indicators under Sections
 39.053(c)(1)-(4) [Section 39.053(c)].
 SECTION 20.  Section 39.305(b), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (b)  The report card shall include the following
 information:
 (1)  where applicable, the [student] achievement
 indicators described by Section 39.053(c) and the reporting
 indicators described by Sections 39.301(c)(1) through (5);
 (2)  average class size by grade level and subject;
 (3)  the administrative and instructional costs per
 student, computed in a manner consistent with Section 44.0071; and
 (4)  the district's instructional expenditures ratio
 and instructional employees ratio computed under Section 44.0071,
 and the statewide average of those ratios, as determined by the
 commissioner.
 SECTION 21.  Sections 39.332(b)(2) and (20), Education Code,
 are amended to read as follows:
 (2)  The report must contain an evaluation of the
 status of education in the state as reflected by:
 (A)  the [student] achievement indicators
 described by Section 39.053; and
 (B)  the reporting indicators described by
 Section 39.301.
 (20)  The report must contain a comparison of the
 performance of open-enrollment charter schools and school
 districts on the [student] achievement indicators described by
 Section 39.053(c), the reporting indicators described by Section
 39.301(c), and the accountability measures adopted under Section
 39.053(i), with a separately aggregated comparison of the
 performance of open-enrollment charter schools predominantly
 serving students at risk of dropping out of school, as described by
 Section 29.081(d), with the performance of school districts.
 SECTION 22.  Sections 39.053(e) and 39.054(b), (d), and
 (d-1), Education Code, are repealed.
 SECTION 23.  Not later than December 1, 2016, the
 commissioner of education shall adopt the set of indicators to
 measure and evaluate school districts and campuses as required by
 Section 39.053, Education Code, as amended by this Act.
 SECTION 24.  Not later than January 1, 2017, the
 commissioner of education shall submit a report to the standing
 committees of the legislature having primary jurisdiction over
 primary and secondary education that provides for a preliminary
 evaluation of school districts and campuses under Section 39.054,
 Education Code. The report must include:
 (1)  the rating each school district and campus would
 have received for the first through fourth domains of indicators as
 provided by Sections 39.053(c)(1)-(4), Education Code, as amended
 by this Act, for the 2015-2016 school year if the indicators adopted
 by the commissioner of education under Section 39.053, Education
 Code, as amended by this Act, existed during the 2015-2016 school
 year; and
 (2)  the correlation between each designated letter
 performance rating the school district or campus would have
 received and the percentage of students at each district and
 campus:
 (A)  qualifying for the free or reduced-price
 breakfast under the national school breakfast programs provided for
 by the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. Section 1773);
 (B)  that are students of limited English
 proficiency as defined by Section 29.052, Education Code; and
 (C)  disaggregated by race, ethnicity, and
 socioeconomic status used to assign ratings in the system.
 SECTION 25.  (a)  Except as provided by Subsections (b), (c),
 and (d) of this section, this Act applies beginning with the
 2017-2018 school year.
 (b)  Section 39.0535, Education Code, as added by this Act,
 applies beginning with the 2015-2016 school year.
 (c)  Section 39.054(a), Education Code, as amended by this
 Act effective September 1, 2016, applies beginning with the
 2016-2017 school year.
 (d)  Subchapter N, Chapter 39, Education Code, as added by
 this Act, applies beginning with the effective date of this Act.
 SECTION 26.  Except as otherwise provided by this Act, this
 Act takes effect immediately if it receives a vote of two-thirds of
 all the members elected to each house, as provided by Section 39,
 Article III, Texas Constitution.  If this Act does not receive the
 vote necessary for immediate effect, this Act takes effect
 September 1, 2015.
 * * * * *