LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 20, 2015 TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB2885 by Giddings (Relating to requiring a school district to report data regarding restraints administered to, sanctions imposed on, complaints filed against, citations issued to, and arrests made of students.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would require the superintendent of a school district to electronically report to the Texas Education Agency (TEA) certain information regarding the uses of restraints, sanctions, complaints, citations, and arrests of students that occurred during the preceding school year The report could not include personally identifiable student information and would be required to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). The bill would require a school district that entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with local law enforcement for the provision of a regular police presence on campus to designate in the MOU which entity would collect the required information for reporting to TEA. The bill would require TEA to collect the reports and provide the compilation of information to the public.The agency estimates there would be a minimal cost associated with implementing the provisions of the bill, related to updating the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) to allow for the collection of student restraint and arrest information. Local Government Impact Local districts would incur costs to provide the required notices and to update the student information systems (SIS) or modify the MOU to collect the required student restraint and arrest information to be reported to the TEA. These costs would vary from district to district depending on whether there was an MOU with local law enforcement, whether the SIS was locally developed or vendor provided, and the frequency of the use of restraints or arrests of students. Source Agencies:407 Commission on Law Enforcement, 701 Central Education Agency LBB Staff: UP, ESi, JBi
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 20, 2015
TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB2885 by Giddings (Relating to requiring a school district to report data regarding restraints administered to, sanctions imposed on, complaints filed against, citations issued to, and arrests made of students.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2885 by Giddings (Relating to requiring a school district to report data regarding restraints administered to, sanctions imposed on, complaints filed against, citations issued to, and arrests made of students.), As Introduced
Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues
Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB2885 by Giddings (Relating to requiring a school district to report data regarding restraints administered to, sanctions imposed on, complaints filed against, citations issued to, and arrests made of students.), As Introduced
HB2885 by Giddings (Relating to requiring a school district to report data regarding restraints administered to, sanctions imposed on, complaints filed against, citations issued to, and arrests made of students.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would require the superintendent of a school district to electronically report to the Texas Education Agency (TEA) certain information regarding the uses of restraints, sanctions, complaints, citations, and arrests of students that occurred during the preceding school year The report could not include personally identifiable student information and would be required to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). The bill would require a school district that entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with local law enforcement for the provision of a regular police presence on campus to designate in the MOU which entity would collect the required information for reporting to TEA. The bill would require TEA to collect the reports and provide the compilation of information to the public.The agency estimates there would be a minimal cost associated with implementing the provisions of the bill, related to updating the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) to allow for the collection of student restraint and arrest information.
Local Government Impact
Local districts would incur costs to provide the required notices and to update the student information systems (SIS) or modify the MOU to collect the required student restraint and arrest information to be reported to the TEA. These costs would vary from district to district depending on whether there was an MOU with local law enforcement, whether the SIS was locally developed or vendor provided, and the frequency of the use of restraints or arrests of students.
Source Agencies: 407 Commission on Law Enforcement, 701 Central Education Agency
407 Commission on Law Enforcement, 701 Central Education Agency
LBB Staff: UP, ESi, JBi
UP, ESi, JBi