Texas 2015 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB2962 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 19, 2015      TO: Honorable Jodie Laubenberg, Chair, House Committee on Elections      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2962 by Sanford (Relating to ballot language for a proposition to approve the issuance of bonds by a county.), As Introduced    No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.   Local Government Impact A county would be required to include in a proposition submitted to voters for approval ofthe issuance of bonds the most recent bond rating and a description of the applicable bond rating system. Costs to counties are not anticipated to be significant.    Source Agencies:   LBB Staff:  UP, AG, SD    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 19, 2015





  TO: Honorable Jodie Laubenberg, Chair, House Committee on Elections      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2962 by Sanford (Relating to ballot language for a proposition to approve the issuance of bonds by a county.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Jodie Laubenberg, Chair, House Committee on Elections
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2962 by Sanford (Relating to ballot language for a proposition to approve the issuance of bonds by a county.), As Introduced

 Honorable Jodie Laubenberg, Chair, House Committee on Elections 

 Honorable Jodie Laubenberg, Chair, House Committee on Elections 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB2962 by Sanford (Relating to ballot language for a proposition to approve the issuance of bonds by a county.), As Introduced

HB2962 by Sanford (Relating to ballot language for a proposition to approve the issuance of bonds by a county.), As Introduced



No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.





Local Government Impact

A county would be required to include in a proposition submitted to voters for approval ofthe issuance of bonds the most recent bond rating and a description of the applicable bond rating system. Costs to counties are not anticipated to be significant.

Source Agencies:



LBB Staff: UP, AG, SD

 UP, AG, SD