Texas 2015 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB3208 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 10, 2015      TO: Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3208 by King, Tracy O. (Relating to rights to appeal rate and damage schedule determinations by the Board of Regents governing certain easements or other interests in land of The University of Texas System.), As Introduced    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Education Code relating to rights to appeal rate and damage schedule determinations by the Board of Regents governing certain easements or other interests in land of The University of Texas (UT) System. The bill would allow an individual to appeal a rate or damage schedule determination to a district court for a de novo review within 30 days of receiving the Board of Regents final determination. Based on information provided by UT System, each appeal initiated under the provisions of the bill would result in additional costs to the Permanent University Fund from the related legal defense costs. This analysis assumes any additional costs would not be significant.Based on information provided by the Office of Court Administration, any additional costs associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be absorbed within existing agency resources. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 720 The University of Texas System Administration   LBB Staff:  UP, SZ, DEH, GO, ED, KVe    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 10, 2015





  TO: Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3208 by King, Tracy O. (Relating to rights to appeal rate and damage schedule determinations by the Board of Regents governing certain easements or other interests in land of The University of Texas System.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3208 by King, Tracy O. (Relating to rights to appeal rate and damage schedule determinations by the Board of Regents governing certain easements or other interests in land of The University of Texas System.), As Introduced

 Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management 

 Honorable Joe Deshotel, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB3208 by King, Tracy O. (Relating to rights to appeal rate and damage schedule determinations by the Board of Regents governing certain easements or other interests in land of The University of Texas System.), As Introduced

HB3208 by King, Tracy O. (Relating to rights to appeal rate and damage schedule determinations by the Board of Regents governing certain easements or other interests in land of The University of Texas System.), As Introduced



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Education Code relating to rights to appeal rate and damage schedule determinations by the Board of Regents governing certain easements or other interests in land of The University of Texas (UT) System. The bill would allow an individual to appeal a rate or damage schedule determination to a district court for a de novo review within 30 days of receiving the Board of Regents final determination. Based on information provided by UT System, each appeal initiated under the provisions of the bill would result in additional costs to the Permanent University Fund from the related legal defense costs. This analysis assumes any additional costs would not be significant.Based on information provided by the Office of Court Administration, any additional costs associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be absorbed within existing agency resources.

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 720 The University of Texas System Administration

212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 720 The University of Texas System Administration

LBB Staff: UP, SZ, DEH, GO, ED, KVe

 UP, SZ, DEH, GO, ED, KVe