LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 8, 2015 TO: Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB3326 by Thompson, Senfronia (Relating to decreasing the punishment for certain misdemeanor and felony offenses.), As Introduced Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB3326, As Introduced: a positive impact of $163,843,697 through the biennium ending August 31, 2017. The probable fiscal impact of implementing the provisions of the bill related to value ladder adjustments bill is expected to be positive but it is indeterminate due to the unavailability of reliable data or information related to the exact amount of pecuniary loss for certain offenses against property or public administration. Depending upon the number of convictions that could be affected by the shifting punishment categories, there could also be an indeterminate revenue impact to the state.The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 8, 2015
TO: Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB3326 by Thompson, Senfronia (Relating to decreasing the punishment for certain misdemeanor and felony offenses.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3326 by Thompson, Senfronia (Relating to decreasing the punishment for certain misdemeanor and felony offenses.), As Introduced
Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB3326 by Thompson, Senfronia (Relating to decreasing the punishment for certain misdemeanor and felony offenses.), As Introduced
HB3326 by Thompson, Senfronia (Relating to decreasing the punishment for certain misdemeanor and felony offenses.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB3326, As Introduced: a positive impact of $163,843,697 through the biennium ending August 31, 2017. The probable fiscal impact of implementing the provisions of the bill related to value ladder adjustments bill is expected to be positive but it is indeterminate due to the unavailability of reliable data or information related to the exact amount of pecuniary loss for certain offenses against property or public administration. Depending upon the number of convictions that could be affected by the shifting punishment categories, there could also be an indeterminate revenue impact to the state.The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB3326, As Introduced: a positive impact of $163,843,697 through the biennium ending August 31, 2017.
The probable fiscal impact of implementing the provisions of the bill related to value ladder adjustments bill is expected to be positive but it is indeterminate due to the unavailability of reliable data or information related to the exact amount of pecuniary loss for certain offenses against property or public administration. Depending upon the number of convictions that could be affected by the shifting punishment categories, there could also be an indeterminate revenue impact to the state.The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
The probable fiscal impact of implementing the provisions of the bill related to value ladder adjustments bill is expected to be positive but it is indeterminate due to the unavailability of reliable data or information related to the exact amount of pecuniary loss for certain offenses against property or public administration. Depending upon the number of convictions that could be affected by the shifting punishment categories, there could also be an indeterminate revenue impact to the state.The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds 2016 $55,212,850 2017 $108,630,847 2018 $108,950,323 2019 $109,225,061 2020 $109,467,006
2016 $55,212,850
2017 $108,630,847
2018 $108,950,323
2019 $109,225,061
2020 $109,467,006
All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 2016 $55,212,850 2017 $108,630,847 2018 $108,950,323 2019 $109,225,061 2020 $109,467,006
Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 2016 $55,212,850 2017 $108,630,847 2018 $108,950,323 2019 $109,225,061 2020 $109,467,006
2016 $55,212,850
2017 $108,630,847
2018 $108,950,323
2019 $109,225,061
2020 $109,467,006
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would amend the various codes as they relate to the punishment for certain misdemeanor and felony offenses. Under the provisions of the bill the punishment for certain drug-related offenses would be reduced from a state jail felony to a class A misdemeanor. The bill would also alter the amounts of pecuniary loss that constitute an offense for certain misdemeanor and felony offenses and reduce all punishment levels for fraudulent use or possession of identifying information. Under the provisions of the bill, prostitution and forgery would no longer be punishable as a state jail felony.
The bill would amend the various codes as they relate to the punishment for certain misdemeanor and felony offenses. Under the provisions of the bill the punishment for certain drug-related offenses would be reduced from a state jail felony to a class A misdemeanor. The bill would also alter the amounts of pecuniary loss that constitute an offense for certain misdemeanor and felony offenses and reduce all punishment levels for fraudulent use or possession of identifying information. Under the provisions of the bill, prostitution and forgery would no longer be punishable as a state jail felony.
Methodology
In fiscal year 2014, 11,765 people subject to the bill's provisions were admitted to state correctional facilities and 9,451 were placed on felony community supervision. This analysis assumes the offenders subject to the bill's provisions would no longer be eligible for confinement in state correctional facilities or placed under felony community supervision. Instead, these offenders would be charged with misdemeanor offenses and subject to confinement in county jails or placement on misdemeanor community supervision. Cost per day figures included in this analysis are based on those reported in the February 2015 Criminal and Juvenile Justice Uniform Cost Report. Incarceration savings are estimated at $54.89 per offender, per day for prison and $47.30 per offender, per day for state jail. Felony community supervision savings are estimated at $1.63 per offender, per day. Felony community supervision savings would be partially offset by misdemeanor community supervision costs of $0.70 per offender, per day. The state provides Community Supervision and Corrections Departments $0.70 per misdemeanor offender, per day for 182 days. Parole supervision savings are estimated at $4.04 per offender, per day. Based on the adult correctional population projections included in the February 2015 Adult and Juvenile Correctional Population Projections Report, and assuming all other sentencing practices remain constant, the bill's provisions would result in net savings of $108,569,095 during fiscal year 2016. This analysis assumes the bill's provisions would reach partial implementation for fiscal year 2016 and reach full implementation in fiscal years 2017 and beyond.These net savings include incarceration savings of $103,874,817, felony community supervision savings of $5,598,307, and parole supervision savings of $285,378. Net savings are partially offset by misdemeanor community supervision costs of $1,189,406. The revenue loss associated with reduced collections of criminal fines and court costs as a result of implementing the provisions of the bill is indeterminate.The probable fiscal impact of implementing the provisions of the bill related to value ladder adjustments bill is expected to be positive but it is indeterminate due to the unavailability of reliable data or information related to the exact amount of pecuniary loss for certain offenses against property or public administration. Depending upon the number of convictions that could be affected by the shifting punishment categories, there could also be an indeterminate revenue impact to the state.
In fiscal year 2014, 11,765 people subject to the bill's provisions were admitted to state correctional facilities and 9,451 were placed on felony community supervision. This analysis assumes the offenders subject to the bill's provisions would no longer be eligible for confinement in state correctional facilities or placed under felony community supervision. Instead, these offenders would be charged with misdemeanor offenses and subject to confinement in county jails or placement on misdemeanor community supervision. Cost per day figures included in this analysis are based on those reported in the February 2015 Criminal and Juvenile Justice Uniform Cost Report. Incarceration savings are estimated at $54.89 per offender, per day for prison and $47.30 per offender, per day for state jail. Felony community supervision savings are estimated at $1.63 per offender, per day. Felony community supervision savings would be partially offset by misdemeanor community supervision costs of $0.70 per offender, per day. The state provides Community Supervision and Corrections Departments $0.70 per misdemeanor offender, per day for 182 days. Parole supervision savings are estimated at $4.04 per offender, per day. Based on the adult correctional population projections included in the February 2015 Adult and Juvenile Correctional Population Projections Report, and assuming all other sentencing practices remain constant, the bill's provisions would result in net savings of $108,569,095 during fiscal year 2016. This analysis assumes the bill's provisions would reach partial implementation for fiscal year 2016 and reach full implementation in fiscal years 2017 and beyond.These net savings include incarceration savings of $103,874,817, felony community supervision savings of $5,598,307, and parole supervision savings of $285,378. Net savings are partially offset by misdemeanor community supervision costs of $1,189,406. The revenue loss associated with reduced collections of criminal fines and court costs as a result of implementing the provisions of the bill is indeterminate.The probable fiscal impact of implementing the provisions of the bill related to value ladder adjustments bill is expected to be positive but it is indeterminate due to the unavailability of reliable data or information related to the exact amount of pecuniary loss for certain offenses against property or public administration. Depending upon the number of convictions that could be affected by the shifting punishment categories, there could also be an indeterminate revenue impact to the state.
Local Government Impact
A Class C misdemeanor is punishable by a fine of not more than $500. Depending on the offense committed, the bill could increase fine revenue for counties; however, the revenue could be offset by the increase of offenders in county jail due to the various penalties decreased from felonies to misdemeanors under the provisions of the bill. Due to the vast characteristics of the offender population and the unknown composition of the future offender population, the impact on local governments is difficult to estimate. The impact on counties would vary depending on a number of factors including, the number of future cases of certain offenses; the severity of each case; the resources of each individual county; and the size of the county. According to the Texas Commission on Jail Standards, the average cost for an inmate in a county jail is $60.01 per day.
A Class C misdemeanor is punishable by a fine of not more than $500. Depending on the offense committed, the bill could increase fine revenue for counties; however, the revenue could be offset by the increase of offenders in county jail due to the various penalties decreased from felonies to misdemeanors under the provisions of the bill. Due to the vast characteristics of the offender population and the unknown composition of the future offender population, the impact on local governments is difficult to estimate. The impact on counties would vary depending on a number of factors including, the number of future cases of certain offenses; the severity of each case; the resources of each individual county; and the size of the county. According to the Texas Commission on Jail Standards, the average cost for an inmate in a county jail is $60.01 per day.
Source Agencies: 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff: UP, KJo, LM, EK
UP, KJo, LM, EK