Texas House Bill HB3553

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to the definition of peace officer for purposes of intercepting or collecting information in relation to certain communications in an investigation of criminal conduct.

Impact

The implications of HB3553 on state laws are significant as it modifies who is considered a peace officer under Texas law. By expanding the definition to include fire marshals and related investigators, the bill potentially increases the efficiency of inquiries into criminal activities where such officers must collect or intercept communications. This could lead to faster responses in cases involving public safety concerns that may relate to fire safety and other emergency situations.

Summary

House Bill 3553 seeks to amend the definition of 'authorized peace officer' within the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. The bill expands the list of individuals recognized as peace officers who are authorized to intercept or collect information during investigations of criminal conduct. In particular, it includes additional titles such as fire marshals and inspectors who are commissioned by counties, thereby broadening the scope of personnel capable of conducting such investigations. This change is aimed at enhancing law enforcement capabilities in Texas by allowing more officials to be authorized for crucial intelligence-gathering operations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB3553 appears to be generally supportive among law enforcement and public safety advocates who see the amendment as an important step in strengthening the resources available for criminal investigations. However, there may be concerns regarding oversight and the potential for misuse of expanded powers by a broader range of law enforcement personnel. The discussions leading up to the bill's drafting likely emphasized the balance between enhancing law enforcement capabilities and maintaining civil liberties.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to the bill involve discussions about the scope of authority granted to newly classified peace officers and the implications for privacy rights of citizens. Opponents may argue that allowing a wider array of personnel to engage in interception and collection activities could lead to overreach or unregulated surveillance, sparking debates about accountability and the protection of citizens' rights within the framework of criminal investigations.