Texas 2015 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB3578 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 20, 2015      TO: Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3578 by Alonzo (Relating to the date on which certain criminal defendants are eligible to file a petition for an order of nondisclosure.), As Introduced    The bill would have a positive, but indeterminate, fiscal implication to the state for the 2016-17 biennium due to anticipated increases in civil filing fee revenue that would be realized from more persons being eligible to file a petition for nondisclosure. It is estimated that the number of petitions of nondisclosure being filed would return to current levels or less in following years.  The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to reduce the waiting time for persons successfully completing deferred adjudication community supervision to file a petition for an order of nondisclosure. The bill would decrease the waiting time to file a petition for nondisclosure for certain misdemeanors from two years to one years and for felonies from five years to three years. The Office of Court Administration (OCA) anticipates that the decrease in waiting time under the provisions of the bill would result in a greater, but indeterminate, number of petitions for nondisclosure being filed during the 2016-17 biennium. This would result in an indeterminate increase in filing fee revenue realized by the State. However, OCA also estimates that the number of petitions being filed would drop back to current levels or even decrease in the following years. Therefore, OCA does not anticipate a significant fiscal impact to the state court system over a five-year period. Local Government Impact OCA anticipates that a decrease in waiting time for persons successfully completing deferred adjudication community supervision to file a petition for an order of nondisclosure would result in an initial increase in civil filing fee revenue to counties in an indeterminate amount. However, OCA also estimates that the number of petitions being filed would drop back to current levels or even decrease in the following years. Therefore, OCA does not anticipate a significant fiscal impact to counties over a five-year period.    Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council   LBB Staff:  UP, KJo, MW, GDz    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 20, 2015





  TO: Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3578 by Alonzo (Relating to the date on which certain criminal defendants are eligible to file a petition for an order of nondisclosure.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3578 by Alonzo (Relating to the date on which certain criminal defendants are eligible to file a petition for an order of nondisclosure.), As Introduced

 Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence 

 Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB3578 by Alonzo (Relating to the date on which certain criminal defendants are eligible to file a petition for an order of nondisclosure.), As Introduced

HB3578 by Alonzo (Relating to the date on which certain criminal defendants are eligible to file a petition for an order of nondisclosure.), As Introduced



The bill would have a positive, but indeterminate, fiscal implication to the state for the 2016-17 biennium due to anticipated increases in civil filing fee revenue that would be realized from more persons being eligible to file a petition for nondisclosure. It is estimated that the number of petitions of nondisclosure being filed would return to current levels or less in following years.

The bill would have a positive, but indeterminate, fiscal implication to the state for the 2016-17 biennium due to anticipated increases in civil filing fee revenue that would be realized from more persons being eligible to file a petition for nondisclosure. It is estimated that the number of petitions of nondisclosure being filed would return to current levels or less in following years.



The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to reduce the waiting time for persons successfully completing deferred adjudication community supervision to file a petition for an order of nondisclosure. The bill would decrease the waiting time to file a petition for nondisclosure for certain misdemeanors from two years to one years and for felonies from five years to three years. The Office of Court Administration (OCA) anticipates that the decrease in waiting time under the provisions of the bill would result in a greater, but indeterminate, number of petitions for nondisclosure being filed during the 2016-17 biennium. This would result in an indeterminate increase in filing fee revenue realized by the State. However, OCA also estimates that the number of petitions being filed would drop back to current levels or even decrease in the following years. Therefore, OCA does not anticipate a significant fiscal impact to the state court system over a five-year period.

Local Government Impact

OCA anticipates that a decrease in waiting time for persons successfully completing deferred adjudication community supervision to file a petition for an order of nondisclosure would result in an initial increase in civil filing fee revenue to counties in an indeterminate amount. However, OCA also estimates that the number of petitions being filed would drop back to current levels or even decrease in the following years. Therefore, OCA does not anticipate a significant fiscal impact to counties over a five-year period.

Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council

212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council

LBB Staff: UP, KJo, MW, GDz

 UP, KJo, MW, GDz