Texas 2015 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB3765 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 12, 2015      TO: Honorable Byron Cook, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3765 by Laubenberg (Relating to consent to an abortion on a minor.), As Introduced    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would require a physician performing an abortion on an unemancipated minor to obtain written, notarized consent of the minor and the minor's parent, managing conservator, or legal guardian except in certain circumstances. The Department of State Health Services indicates that implementation of the provisions of the bill can absorbed within existing resources. Local Government Impact No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:537 State Health Services, Department of   LBB Staff:  UP, AG, WP, CH, LR    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 12, 2015





  TO: Honorable Byron Cook, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3765 by Laubenberg (Relating to consent to an abortion on a minor.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Byron Cook, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3765 by Laubenberg (Relating to consent to an abortion on a minor.), As Introduced

 Honorable Byron Cook, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs 

 Honorable Byron Cook, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB3765 by Laubenberg (Relating to consent to an abortion on a minor.), As Introduced

HB3765 by Laubenberg (Relating to consent to an abortion on a minor.), As Introduced



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would require a physician performing an abortion on an unemancipated minor to obtain written, notarized consent of the minor and the minor's parent, managing conservator, or legal guardian except in certain circumstances. The Department of State Health Services indicates that implementation of the provisions of the bill can absorbed within existing resources.

Local Government Impact

No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 537 State Health Services, Department of

537 State Health Services, Department of

LBB Staff: UP, AG, WP, CH, LR

 UP, AG, WP, CH, LR