Texas 2015 84th Regular

Texas House Bill HB3864 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 14, 2015      TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3864 by Sanford (Relating to protection of the rights of conscience for child welfare services providers.), As Introduced    The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined at this time as it is unknown how many child welfare service providers will decline to provide services to individuals under the circumstances described in the bill and then use the cause action in response to adverse action by the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS).   The bill would add Chapter 45 to Title 2 of the Family Code which would create a cause of action for child welfare services provider against a state agency if that state agency were to discriminate or take any adverse action against the provider on the basis that the provider declined to provide services to an individual on the basis of the provider's sincerely held religious beliefs, provides or intends to provide religious education, or declined to provide contraceptive services. The bill would also waive sovereign immunity from suit with regard to the extent of liability created by the proposed chapter.  DFPS does not keep track of the instances when a child welfare services provider declines to provide services to individuals. A significant portion of child care services providers are faith-based organizations, making the pool of potential litigants large. In cases where DFPS purchases services from the child welfare services provider, such protected action described in the bill could give rise to contractual issues. Due to these reasons, DFPS cannot determine the fiscal implications of this bill. The Office of Court Administration anticipates no significant fiscal impact resulting from this bill. The bill would take effect immediately if it receives a vote of two-thirds of all members elected to each house. Otherwise, the bill would take effect on September 1st, 2015.  Local Government Impact There may be a cost to local governmental entities depending on the number of suits filed; however, the fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined at this time.    Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of   LBB Staff:  UP, ESi, MH, CG, KVe    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 14, 2015





  TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3864 by Sanford (Relating to protection of the rights of conscience for child welfare services providers.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3864 by Sanford (Relating to protection of the rights of conscience for child welfare services providers.), As Introduced

 Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues 

 Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB3864 by Sanford (Relating to protection of the rights of conscience for child welfare services providers.), As Introduced

HB3864 by Sanford (Relating to protection of the rights of conscience for child welfare services providers.), As Introduced



The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined at this time as it is unknown how many child welfare service providers will decline to provide services to individuals under the circumstances described in the bill and then use the cause action in response to adverse action by the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS). 

The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined at this time as it is unknown how many child welfare service providers will decline to provide services to individuals under the circumstances described in the bill and then use the cause action in response to adverse action by the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS). 



The bill would add Chapter 45 to Title 2 of the Family Code which would create a cause of action for child welfare services provider against a state agency if that state agency were to discriminate or take any adverse action against the provider on the basis that the provider declined to provide services to an individual on the basis of the provider's sincerely held religious beliefs, provides or intends to provide religious education, or declined to provide contraceptive services. The bill would also waive sovereign immunity from suit with regard to the extent of liability created by the proposed chapter.  DFPS does not keep track of the instances when a child welfare services provider declines to provide services to individuals. A significant portion of child care services providers are faith-based organizations, making the pool of potential litigants large. In cases where DFPS purchases services from the child welfare services provider, such protected action described in the bill could give rise to contractual issues. Due to these reasons, DFPS cannot determine the fiscal implications of this bill. The Office of Court Administration anticipates no significant fiscal impact resulting from this bill. The bill would take effect immediately if it receives a vote of two-thirds of all members elected to each house. Otherwise, the bill would take effect on September 1st, 2015. 

Local Government Impact

There may be a cost to local governmental entities depending on the number of suits filed; however, the fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined at this time.

Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of

212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of

LBB Staff: UP, ESi, MH, CG, KVe

 UP, ESi, MH, CG, KVe