LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 19, 2015 TO: Honorable Kelly Hancock, Chair, Senate Committee on Administration FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB456 by Gutierrez (Relating to a prohibition on the use and possession of e-cigarettes on school property.), As Engrossed No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would require school districts to publish in their student handbook whether they have adopted and enforce policies and procedures that prescribe penalties for the use of e-cigarettes. The bill would require the board of trustees of a school district to prohibit the use or possession of e-cigarettes on school property or at a school-related or school-sanctioned activity on or off school property. Local Government Impact No significant administrative costs are anticipated for school districts to amend local policies and publish the policies in the student handbook. Source Agencies:701 Central Education Agency LBB Staff: UP, KK, JBi
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 19, 2015
TO: Honorable Kelly Hancock, Chair, Senate Committee on Administration FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB456 by Gutierrez (Relating to a prohibition on the use and possession of e-cigarettes on school property.), As Engrossed
TO: Honorable Kelly Hancock, Chair, Senate Committee on Administration
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB456 by Gutierrez (Relating to a prohibition on the use and possession of e-cigarettes on school property.), As Engrossed
Honorable Kelly Hancock, Chair, Senate Committee on Administration
Honorable Kelly Hancock, Chair, Senate Committee on Administration
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB456 by Gutierrez (Relating to a prohibition on the use and possession of e-cigarettes on school property.), As Engrossed
HB456 by Gutierrez (Relating to a prohibition on the use and possession of e-cigarettes on school property.), As Engrossed
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would require school districts to publish in their student handbook whether they have adopted and enforce policies and procedures that prescribe penalties for the use of e-cigarettes. The bill would require the board of trustees of a school district to prohibit the use or possession of e-cigarettes on school property or at a school-related or school-sanctioned activity on or off school property.
Local Government Impact
No significant administrative costs are anticipated for school districts to amend local policies and publish the policies in the student handbook.
Source Agencies: 701 Central Education Agency
701 Central Education Agency
LBB Staff: UP, KK, JBi
UP, KK, JBi