Texas Senate Bill SB1082

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to the establishment of an informal preliminary hearing process before the suspension, revocation, or denial of certain occupational licenses as a result of certain criminal convictions.

Impact

This legislation aims to protect the rights of individuals who have been convicted of crimes that may not directly relate to the responsibilities of their occupational licenses. With this new hearing procedure, individuals will receive notice and have the opportunity to argue against the proposed actions of licensing authorities. This addition can lead to more nuanced considerations of each case, ultimately fostering an environment that emphasizes rehabilitation over punitive measures for past behaviors. Furthermore, it may influence how licensing bodies assess the relevance of a conviction to the profession in question.

Summary

SB1082 establishes an informal preliminary hearing process before any suspension, revocation, or denial of certain occupational licenses resulting from a person's criminal convictions. The bill specifically amends the Occupations Code to ensure that individuals are given a fair opportunity to respond to allegations that could impact their ability to secure or maintain a professional license. The interim review process is intended to create a more just system by allowing individuals to present their case before a decision is made by the licensing authority.

Contention

The bill is likely to spark debate among stakeholders regarding the balance between public safety and individuals’ right to work. Proponents argue that SB1082 is necessary for due process and supports the reintegration of formerly incarcerated individuals back into the workforce. However, opponents may express concerns about the implications for public safety, arguing that such hearings could slow down the licensing process or lead to undesired outcomes if individuals with serious offenses are allowed to retain their licenses. The bill reflects a shift towards a more rehabilitative approach in licensing decisions, which could blur the lines between public interest and personal redemption.