LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 11, 2015 TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB1223 by Bettencourt (Relating to requiring the consent of all parties to legally intercept certain communications.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Civil Practice and Remedies Code, regarding interception of communications. It would change the definition of "interception" that could give rise to a civil action, to mean contents of communication acquired without the consent of all parties, rather than a single party. The bill would amend the Penal Code regarding affirmative defenses to the offense of unlawful interception of a communication. The bill would require a person employed by a common carrier making interceptions, as described, to notify local police authorities within 48 hours after the interception. The Office of Court Administration indicates implementing bill provisions are not anticipated to have a significant fiscal implication for the court system. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council LBB Staff: UP, KJo, TB
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 11, 2015
TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB1223 by Bettencourt (Relating to requiring the consent of all parties to legally intercept certain communications.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB1223 by Bettencourt (Relating to requiring the consent of all parties to legally intercept certain communications.), As Introduced
Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB1223 by Bettencourt (Relating to requiring the consent of all parties to legally intercept certain communications.), As Introduced
SB1223 by Bettencourt (Relating to requiring the consent of all parties to legally intercept certain communications.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Civil Practice and Remedies Code, regarding interception of communications. It would change the definition of "interception" that could give rise to a civil action, to mean contents of communication acquired without the consent of all parties, rather than a single party. The bill would amend the Penal Code regarding affirmative defenses to the offense of unlawful interception of a communication. The bill would require a person employed by a common carrier making interceptions, as described, to notify local police authorities within 48 hours after the interception. The Office of Court Administration indicates implementing bill provisions are not anticipated to have a significant fiscal implication for the court system.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
LBB Staff: UP, KJo, TB
UP, KJo, TB