LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION Revision 1 May 4, 2015 TO: Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB130 by West (Relating to the eligibility of criminal defendants for an order of nondisclosure; authorizing a fee.), As Engrossed Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB130, As Engrossed: a positive impact of $1,202,320 through the biennium ending August 31, 2017. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
Revision 1
May 4, 2015
Revision 1
Revision 1
TO: Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB130 by West (Relating to the eligibility of criminal defendants for an order of nondisclosure; authorizing a fee.), As Engrossed
TO: Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB130 by West (Relating to the eligibility of criminal defendants for an order of nondisclosure; authorizing a fee.), As Engrossed
Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB130 by West (Relating to the eligibility of criminal defendants for an order of nondisclosure; authorizing a fee.), As Engrossed
SB130 by West (Relating to the eligibility of criminal defendants for an order of nondisclosure; authorizing a fee.), As Engrossed
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB130, As Engrossed: a positive impact of $1,202,320 through the biennium ending August 31, 2017. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB130, As Engrossed: a positive impact of $1,202,320 through the biennium ending August 31, 2017.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds 2016 $601,160 2017 $601,160 2018 $601,160 2019 $601,160 2020 $601,160
2016 $601,160
2017 $601,160
2018 $601,160
2019 $601,160
2020 $601,160
All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain fromJudicial Fund573 Probable Revenue Gain fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Probable Revenue Gain fromStatewide Electronic Filing System5157 2016 $2,019,815 $601,160 $429,400 2017 $2,019,815 $601,160 $429,400 2018 $2,019,815 $601,160 $429,400 2019 $2,019,815 $601,160 $429,400 2020 $2,019,815 $601,160 $429,400
Fiscal Year Probable Revenue Gain fromJudicial Fund573 Probable Revenue Gain fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Probable Revenue Gain fromStatewide Electronic Filing System5157 2016 $2,019,815 $601,160 $429,400 2017 $2,019,815 $601,160 $429,400 2018 $2,019,815 $601,160 $429,400 2019 $2,019,815 $601,160 $429,400 2020 $2,019,815 $601,160 $429,400
2016 $2,019,815 $601,160 $429,400
2017 $2,019,815 $601,160 $429,400
2018 $2,019,815 $601,160 $429,400
2019 $2,019,815 $601,160 $429,400
2020 $2,019,815 $601,160 $429,400
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would amend the Government Code and the Occupations Code to expand the number of persons eligible to file a petition for an order of nondisclosure. Under current law, persons who are placed on deferred adjudication and successfully complete the community supervision associated with that deferred adjudication may file a petition. Persons who are convicted and then placed on community supervision are not eligible to file a petition. The bill would allow many (but not all) convicted persons who are placed on community supervision to file petitions if they successfully complete community supervision. The bill would take effect September 1, 2015.
Methodology
The Office of Court Administration (OCA) estimates the expansion of persons eligible to file a petition would result in approximately 22,600 persons each fiscal year filing such petitions. Of this amount, OCA estimates the bill would result in 21,470 additional persons filing petitions for orders of nondisclosure in district and county courts each year, after taking into account that the judge would waive the fees for some persons eligible to file on the basis of indigence (95 percent of 22,600 persons eligible = 21,470). OCA estimates that the additional workload associated with the filings (22,600) can be handled with existing resources within the court system.The bill would produce additional filing fee revenue for the state due to the increase in civil case filings (21,470), generally $154.50 per case in district court (5,531 filings) or $144.50 per case in a county-level court (15,939 filings) for the following fees:(1) State Consolidated Fee - $50.00 (district court only)(2) Judicial Support Fee -- $42.00 or $40.00, (depending on the type of case and level of court)(3) Petition for Nondisclosure Fee -- $28.00(4) Statewide E-Filing Fee - $20.00(5) Indigent Legal Services Fee -- $10.00 x .95 = $9.50 OCA estimates total amount of new state revenue from filing fees (21,470) due to the increase in the number of petitions for orders of nondisclosure filed would be $3,050,375 each fiscal year, accruing to three accounts: 1) the Judicial Fund No. 573 (Other Funds); 2) General Revenue; and 3) the General Revenue-Dedicated Statewide Electronic Filing Account No. 5157.
Local Government Impact
The bill is expected to have a positive fiscal impact on local government entities because they retain a portion of civil filing fees; however, amount of new filing fee revenue per case will vary by county. According to the Office of Court Administration (OCA), the bill would result in 21,470 additional non-indigent persons filing petitions for orders of nondisclosure in district and county courts each year. OCA estimates that there is likely to be $125.50 in new filing fee revenue from each petition resulting in $2,694,485 in new revenue to counties. Additionally, there could be an additional $107,350 each fiscal year in new revenue from the Appellate Judicial System Filing Fee ($5 x 21,470), which is collected locally and spent locally in support of the appellate court in an appellate judicial district.
The bill is expected to have a positive fiscal impact on local government entities because they retain a portion of civil filing fees; however, amount of new filing fee revenue per case will vary by county. According to the Office of Court Administration (OCA), the bill would result in 21,470 additional non-indigent persons filing petitions for orders of nondisclosure in district and county courts each year. OCA estimates that there is likely to be $125.50 in new filing fee revenue from each petition resulting in $2,694,485 in new revenue to counties. Additionally, there could be an additional $107,350 each fiscal year in new revenue from the Appellate Judicial System Filing Fee ($5 x 21,470), which is collected locally and spent locally in support of the appellate court in an appellate judicial district.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 405 Department of Public Safety
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 405 Department of Public Safety
LBB Staff: UP, FR, KJo, MW, TB, KVe
UP, FR, KJo, MW, TB, KVe