Texas 2015 84th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1369 Senate Committee Report / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 14, 2015      TO: Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB1369 by Zaffirini (Relating to reports on attorney ad litem, guardian ad litem, guardian, mediator, and competency evaluator appointments made by courts in this state and an interim study on a billing system for those appointments.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Government Code, requiring courts to publish information, as described, about court appointments, including individuals appointed as attorneys ad litem, guardians ad litem, guardians appointed under the Estate Code, mediators, and competency evaluators. Some types of appointments would be exempt from reporting requirements.  By November 1 of each year, each court would be required to submit a report to the Office of Court Administration (OCA) and post it at the courthouse and on any court website. A court failing to report would be ineligible for grant money awarded by the state or a state agency. OCA would be required to prescribe the format for reporting the information and to adopt rules to implement the bill.  OCA would also be required to conduct a study on various issues, as described.  OCA would be required to submit the report to the governor and legislative leadership by December 31, 2016.  OCA indicates that the agency can implement bill provisions within existing resources. Further,  no significant fiscal implication to the court system is anticipated because courts clerks are already required by Supreme Court rule to provide reports on payments made of $500 or more on a monthly basis. Local Government Impact The Office of Court Administration indicates that because court clerks are already required by Supreme Court rule to provide reports on payments made of $500 or more on a monthly basis, no significant fiscal impact to the local court system is anticipated.    Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council   LBB Staff:  UP, TB, AG    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 14, 2015





  TO: Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB1369 by Zaffirini (Relating to reports on attorney ad litem, guardian ad litem, guardian, mediator, and competency evaluator appointments made by courts in this state and an interim study on a billing system for those appointments.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted  

TO: Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB1369 by Zaffirini (Relating to reports on attorney ad litem, guardian ad litem, guardian, mediator, and competency evaluator appointments made by courts in this state and an interim study on a billing system for those appointments.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

 Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs 

 Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

SB1369 by Zaffirini (Relating to reports on attorney ad litem, guardian ad litem, guardian, mediator, and competency evaluator appointments made by courts in this state and an interim study on a billing system for those appointments.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

SB1369 by Zaffirini (Relating to reports on attorney ad litem, guardian ad litem, guardian, mediator, and competency evaluator appointments made by courts in this state and an interim study on a billing system for those appointments.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Government Code, requiring courts to publish information, as described, about court appointments, including individuals appointed as attorneys ad litem, guardians ad litem, guardians appointed under the Estate Code, mediators, and competency evaluators. Some types of appointments would be exempt from reporting requirements.  By November 1 of each year, each court would be required to submit a report to the Office of Court Administration (OCA) and post it at the courthouse and on any court website. A court failing to report would be ineligible for grant money awarded by the state or a state agency. OCA would be required to prescribe the format for reporting the information and to adopt rules to implement the bill.  OCA would also be required to conduct a study on various issues, as described.  OCA would be required to submit the report to the governor and legislative leadership by December 31, 2016.  OCA indicates that the agency can implement bill provisions within existing resources. Further,  no significant fiscal implication to the court system is anticipated because courts clerks are already required by Supreme Court rule to provide reports on payments made of $500 or more on a monthly basis.

Local Government Impact

The Office of Court Administration indicates that because court clerks are already required by Supreme Court rule to provide reports on payments made of $500 or more on a monthly basis, no significant fiscal impact to the local court system is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council

212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council

LBB Staff: UP, TB, AG

 UP, TB, AG