Texas Senate Bill SB1629

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to civil liability of a person who produces, distributes, sells, or provides or aids in the production, distribution, sale, or provision of certain synthetic substances to another person for damages caused by the other person.

Impact

The introduction of SB1629 represents a significant shift in how Texas law addresses the production and distribution of synthetic substances. The bill sets forth a strict liability standard, meaning that those engaged in these activities could face substantial financial repercussions if their products cause harm to others. This accountability is designed to deter individuals from distributing dangerous substances and to provide a clear avenue for victims to seek damages. The bill adjusts existing health and safety regulations to incorporate these new civil liability standards, potentially impacting a broad range of stakeholders, from local businesses to parents.

Summary

SB1629 aims to establish civil liability for individuals or entities that produce, distribute, sell, or provide synthetic substances to others, especially minors. The bill defines 'synthetic substance' as any substance intended to produce effects similar to controlled substances. Under this legislation, individuals would be held strictly liable for any damages that arise from another person's consumption of these substances, particularly in cases involving minors. This reflects a growing concern over the dangerous effects of synthetic drugs and their accessibility to young individuals.

Contention

While supporters of SB1629 argue that it is a necessary measure to combat the crisis surrounding synthetic drugs, critiques may arise regarding the implications for individuals and businesses in the supply chain. Concerns about the potential for excessive liability and how it could stifle legitimate businesses that may inadvertently become involved in these cases are points of contention. Further, the application of exemplary damages outlined in the bill could lead to significant financial burdens for accused parties, raising questions about fairness and due process. As such, SB1629 is likely to be a focal point of discussion during legislative sessions.