LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 15, 2015 TO: Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB1931 by Garcia (Relating to the appointment of an attorney ad litem for a parent in certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Family Code to require a court to inform an unrepresented parent in a termination of parental rights case at the parent's first court appearance that the parent has the right to be represented by an attorney and, if the parent is indigent and appears in opposition to the suit, the right to an appointed attorney. The bill would clarify that in order for two parents to share an attorney, there must be no pattern or history of family violence, and would list indigence standards. The bill would amend provisions regarding a temporary attorney ad litem appointment for certain parents. The court would be authorized to appoint an attorney from the time the court ordered the child removed until the court's determination of whether the parent is indigent before the full adversary hearing. The bill outlines the duties of such an attorney. If the court determines the parent is indigent, the attorney may be appointed to continue his or her representation. The Office of Court Administration indicates bill provisions are not anticipated to have a significant fiscal implication for the court system. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council LBB Staff: UP, AG, TB
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 15, 2015
TO: Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB1931 by Garcia (Relating to the appointment of an attorney ad litem for a parent in certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB1931 by Garcia (Relating to the appointment of an attorney ad litem for a parent in certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship.), As Introduced
Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs
Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB1931 by Garcia (Relating to the appointment of an attorney ad litem for a parent in certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship.), As Introduced
SB1931 by Garcia (Relating to the appointment of an attorney ad litem for a parent in certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Family Code to require a court to inform an unrepresented parent in a termination of parental rights case at the parent's first court appearance that the parent has the right to be represented by an attorney and, if the parent is indigent and appears in opposition to the suit, the right to an appointed attorney. The bill would clarify that in order for two parents to share an attorney, there must be no pattern or history of family violence, and would list indigence standards. The bill would amend provisions regarding a temporary attorney ad litem appointment for certain parents. The court would be authorized to appoint an attorney from the time the court ordered the child removed until the court's determination of whether the parent is indigent before the full adversary hearing. The bill outlines the duties of such an attorney. If the court determines the parent is indigent, the attorney may be appointed to continue his or her representation. The Office of Court Administration indicates bill provisions are not anticipated to have a significant fiscal implication for the court system.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
LBB Staff: UP, AG, TB
UP, AG, TB