Texas Senate Bill SB197

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

Caption

Relating to the financial self-sufficiency of the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas.

Impact

The bill's enactment is expected to have significant implications on state laws concerning the funding and management of health agencies. By pushing CPRIT towards self-sufficiency, the legislature aims to reduce reliance on state funds and enhance the operational efficiency of such institutions. The requirement for CPRIT to submit annual plans detailing its pathway to financial independence is intended to provide legislative oversight and accountability. With a clear timeline, the bill aims to transition the role of state funding in cancer research towards a more sustainable model.

Summary

SB197, filed by Senators Schwertner and Bettencourt, focuses on ensuring the financial self-sufficiency of the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT). The bill mandates that CPRIT develop a comprehensive plan to transition to a state of financial independence by specifying steps to operate without state funding by September 1, 2021. This includes identifying alternative funding sources and structuring grants funded by state resources to ensure all are concluded by the stipulated date. The bill is aimed at bolstering the institute's sustainability while maintaining its crucial services in cancer prevention and research.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB197 appears supportive, particularly among legislators advocating for fiscal responsibility and efficient use of state funds. Proponents contend that financial independence for CPRIT can lead to enhanced innovation and a broader search for alternative funding, thus diversifying revenue streams for cancer research. However, some concerns have also been raised regarding the potential consequences of reduced state funding, particularly whether CPRIT would be able to maintain its current level of service and support for cancer prevention initiatives as it shifts to a self-sufficient model.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the feasibility of CPRIT achieving financial independence within the designated timeframe. Critics may question whether CPRIT can effectively secure sufficient non-state funding amidst an environment of increasing competition for grants and donations. Additionally, there are concerns about the implications of closing out state-funded grants and how that might impact ongoing research projects. Ensuring that cancer research continues to progress effectively is a paramount concern as the state shifts funding responsibilities.