LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 15, 2015 TO: Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB279 by Watson (Relating to the authority of the governing body of a taxing unit other than a school district to adopt an exemption from ad valorem taxation of a portion, expressed as a dollar amount, of the appraised value of an individual's residence homestead.), As Engrossed No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend Chapter 11 of the Tax Code, regarding taxable property and exemptions, to authorize taxing units other than school districts to grant a residence homestead exemption of at least $5,000, or a larger amount specified by the taxing unit by taking official action before July 1st of the year in which the exemption is to take effect. The new exemption would be in addition to any other residence homestead exemption to which the property is eligible. In a taxing unit other than a school district that has not previously adopted an optional percentage homestead exemption under Section 11.13(n) of the Tax Code, the proposed new exemption would take effect automatically unless the taxing unit takes official action electing not to adopt the exemption. In a taxing unit other than a school district that rescinds an optional percentage homestead exemption and grants the proposed new exemption, a qualifying taxpayer would be entitled to continue to receive the percentage exemption in lieu of the new exemption if the taxpayer remains qualified, and the amount of the percentage exemption exceeds the amount of the proposed new exemption. The exemption amount would be the dollar amount of the percentage exemption that the individual received in the last tax year in which the governing body granted an exemption under that subsection. The governing body of any taxing unit that adopted an optional percentage homestead exemption for the 2014 tax year may not reduce the amount of or repeal the exemption until the 2025 tax year unless the taxing unit (other than a school district) adopts the new exemption at an amount greater than $5,000.The optional homestead exemption proposed by the bill would create a cost to taxing units other than school districts to the extent that:1) the taxing units that currently grant an optional percentage homestead exemption adopt the new exemption at an amount that results in a larger cost; or 2) other taxing units adopt the new exemption or allow the new exemption to go into effect automatically. The number of taxing units that would adopt the new exemption or allow it to go into effect automatically cannot be predicted. Similarly, the amount at which a taxing unit would set the exemption is unknown. Consequently, the cost of the bill to these taxing units cannot be estimated. This provision would not create a cost to the state. The bill's provision prohibiting taxing units that do not grant the proposed new exemption from repealing or reducing the amount of an optional percentage homestead exemption until tax year 2025 could create a cost to taxing units, including school districts, but the cost cannot be estimated because the value of any exemptions that would be repealed under current law is unknown. This provision would not create a cost to the state because under current law it is unlikely that school districts will receive state funding based on a taxable value resulting from the property value study deduction of one-half of any optional percentage homestead exemption as calculated under Government Code Section 403.302(d)(2) and certified to the commissioner of education under Government Code Section 403.302(k).The bill would take effect on January 1, 2016, contingent on the passage of a constitutional amendment. Local Government Impact The optional homestead exemption proposed by the bill would create a cost to taxing units other than school districts to the extent that 1) the taxing units that currently grant an optional percentage homestead exemption adopt the new exemption at an amount that results in a larger cost; or 2) other taxing units adopt the new exemption or allow the new exemption to go into effect automatically. The number of taxing units that would adopt the new exemption or allow it to go into effect automatically cannot be predicted. Similarly, the amount at which a taxing unit would set the exemption is unknown. Consequently, the cost of the bill to these taxing units cannot be estimated. This provision would not create a cost to the state.The bill's provision prohibiting taxing units that do not grant the proposed new exemption from repealing or reducing the amount of an optional percentage homestead exemption until tax year 2025 could create a cost to taxing units, including school districts, but the cost cannot be estimated because the value of any exemptions that would be repealed under current law is unknown. This provision would not create a cost to the state. Source Agencies:304 Comptroller of Public Accounts LBB Staff: UP, KK, SD, SJS
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 15, 2015
TO: Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB279 by Watson (Relating to the authority of the governing body of a taxing unit other than a school district to adopt an exemption from ad valorem taxation of a portion, expressed as a dollar amount, of the appraised value of an individual's residence homestead.), As Engrossed
TO: Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB279 by Watson (Relating to the authority of the governing body of a taxing unit other than a school district to adopt an exemption from ad valorem taxation of a portion, expressed as a dollar amount, of the appraised value of an individual's residence homestead.), As Engrossed
Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB279 by Watson (Relating to the authority of the governing body of a taxing unit other than a school district to adopt an exemption from ad valorem taxation of a portion, expressed as a dollar amount, of the appraised value of an individual's residence homestead.), As Engrossed
SB279 by Watson (Relating to the authority of the governing body of a taxing unit other than a school district to adopt an exemption from ad valorem taxation of a portion, expressed as a dollar amount, of the appraised value of an individual's residence homestead.), As Engrossed
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend Chapter 11 of the Tax Code, regarding taxable property and exemptions, to authorize taxing units other than school districts to grant a residence homestead exemption of at least $5,000, or a larger amount specified by the taxing unit by taking official action before July 1st of the year in which the exemption is to take effect. The new exemption would be in addition to any other residence homestead exemption to which the property is eligible. In a taxing unit other than a school district that has not previously adopted an optional percentage homestead exemption under Section 11.13(n) of the Tax Code, the proposed new exemption would take effect automatically unless the taxing unit takes official action electing not to adopt the exemption. In a taxing unit other than a school district that rescinds an optional percentage homestead exemption and grants the proposed new exemption, a qualifying taxpayer would be entitled to continue to receive the percentage exemption in lieu of the new exemption if the taxpayer remains qualified, and the amount of the percentage exemption exceeds the amount of the proposed new exemption. The exemption amount would be the dollar amount of the percentage exemption that the individual received in the last tax year in which the governing body granted an exemption under that subsection. The governing body of any taxing unit that adopted an optional percentage homestead exemption for the 2014 tax year may not reduce the amount of or repeal the exemption until the 2025 tax year unless the taxing unit (other than a school district) adopts the new exemption at an amount greater than $5,000.The optional homestead exemption proposed by the bill would create a cost to taxing units other than school districts to the extent that:1) the taxing units that currently grant an optional percentage homestead exemption adopt the new exemption at an amount that results in a larger cost; or 2) other taxing units adopt the new exemption or allow the new exemption to go into effect automatically. The number of taxing units that would adopt the new exemption or allow it to go into effect automatically cannot be predicted. Similarly, the amount at which a taxing unit would set the exemption is unknown. Consequently, the cost of the bill to these taxing units cannot be estimated. This provision would not create a cost to the state. The bill's provision prohibiting taxing units that do not grant the proposed new exemption from repealing or reducing the amount of an optional percentage homestead exemption until tax year 2025 could create a cost to taxing units, including school districts, but the cost cannot be estimated because the value of any exemptions that would be repealed under current law is unknown. This provision would not create a cost to the state because under current law it is unlikely that school districts will receive state funding based on a taxable value resulting from the property value study deduction of one-half of any optional percentage homestead exemption as calculated under Government Code Section 403.302(d)(2) and certified to the commissioner of education under Government Code Section 403.302(k).The bill would take effect on January 1, 2016, contingent on the passage of a constitutional amendment.
Local Government Impact
The optional homestead exemption proposed by the bill would create a cost to taxing units other than school districts to the extent that 1) the taxing units that currently grant an optional percentage homestead exemption adopt the new exemption at an amount that results in a larger cost; or 2) other taxing units adopt the new exemption or allow the new exemption to go into effect automatically. The number of taxing units that would adopt the new exemption or allow it to go into effect automatically cannot be predicted. Similarly, the amount at which a taxing unit would set the exemption is unknown. Consequently, the cost of the bill to these taxing units cannot be estimated. This provision would not create a cost to the state.The bill's provision prohibiting taxing units that do not grant the proposed new exemption from repealing or reducing the amount of an optional percentage homestead exemption until tax year 2025 could create a cost to taxing units, including school districts, but the cost cannot be estimated because the value of any exemptions that would be repealed under current law is unknown. This provision would not create a cost to the state.
Source Agencies: 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff: UP, KK, SD, SJS
UP, KK, SD, SJS