Texas Senate Bill SB35

Texas 2015 - 84th Regular

• Filed: 11/10/14

Caption

Relating to the acknowledgment by management of risks identified in state agency information security plans.

Impact

The enactment of SB35 will introduce a new layer of responsibility for agency heads, requiring them not only to prepare information security plans but also to recognize and document the risks outlined in these plans. This measure is likely to promote a culture of transparency and awareness within state agencies, prioritizing the importance of information security as a critical operational component. Furthermore, agencies can expect to see a shift in how they assess and address risks, potentially leading to better protection of sensitive data.

Summary

Senate Bill 35 (SB35) focuses on enhancing the accountability of state agencies concerning their information security plans. The bill mandates that the executive management within each state agency must formally acknowledge the risks identified in their information security plans. This requirement aims to ensure that agency leadership is fully aware of potential vulnerabilities and risks associated with their information management processes.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB35 appears to be supportive, particularly among legislators and stakeholders concerned with cybersecurity and data protection. Proponents argue that formal acknowledgment of risks is a necessary step in enhancing state agencies' preparedness against potential cybersecurity threats. However, there may be concerns regarding the implementation of this requirement and whether agencies will adequately follow through on their risk management strategies.

Contention

While the bill enjoys bipartisan support, some potential points of contention may arise regarding the transparency and practicality of risk acknowledgment. Concerns may include whether the acknowledgment will merely serve as a formality without substantive change in practices or if it will lead to improvements in security measures. Additionally, discussions around resource allocation for implementing these mandates may surface, as agencies could face challenges in effectively managing and mitigating risks identified.