LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 3, 2015 TO: Honorable Eddie Lucio Jr., Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB573 by Campbell (Relating to the issuance of certain capital appreciation bonds by political subdivisions.), As Introduced No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Government Code to limit the amount of capital appreciation bonds issued by political subdivisions that are secured by ad valorem taxes to not exceed 25% of the political subdivision's total outstanding bonded indebtedness at the time of issuance. The bill would not apply to refunding bonds under Chapter 1207 or capital appreciation bonds for financing transportation projects. Local Government Impact Based on the Texas Bond Review Board's (BRB) 2014 Local Government Annual Report, capital appreciation bonds (CABs) amounts issued by local governments in fiscal year 2014 totaled $476.7 million. School Districts utilize CABs more frequently than other issuers of local debt, issuing 99% of total CABs issued in 2014. The Texas Municipal League indicated that based on the BRB's report, cities did not issue CABs very often in fiscal year 2014.School districts would not be able to issue CABs secured by ad valorem taxes that exceeded 25 percent of their bonded indebtedness at the time of issue; however, they would be able to issue refunding bonds for cost savings or transportation projects. Because total interest costs on CABs can be higher than current interests bonds, school districts may experience savings on the interest paid on bonds if they are limited from issuing CABs, with the exceptions of refunding bonds for cost savings or transportation projects. School districts that have interest and sinking (I&S) rates at or near $0.50 may experience challenges issuing debt. Source Agencies:304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 701 Central Education Agency LBB Staff: UP, KVe, SD, EK, JBi, ED
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 3, 2015
TO: Honorable Eddie Lucio Jr., Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB573 by Campbell (Relating to the issuance of certain capital appreciation bonds by political subdivisions.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Eddie Lucio Jr., Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB573 by Campbell (Relating to the issuance of certain capital appreciation bonds by political subdivisions.), As Introduced
Honorable Eddie Lucio Jr., Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations
Honorable Eddie Lucio Jr., Chair, Senate Committee on Intergovernmental Relations
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB573 by Campbell (Relating to the issuance of certain capital appreciation bonds by political subdivisions.), As Introduced
SB573 by Campbell (Relating to the issuance of certain capital appreciation bonds by political subdivisions.), As Introduced
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Government Code to limit the amount of capital appreciation bonds issued by political subdivisions that are secured by ad valorem taxes to not exceed 25% of the political subdivision's total outstanding bonded indebtedness at the time of issuance. The bill would not apply to refunding bonds under Chapter 1207 or capital appreciation bonds for financing transportation projects.
Local Government Impact
Based on the Texas Bond Review Board's (BRB) 2014 Local Government Annual Report, capital appreciation bonds (CABs) amounts issued by local governments in fiscal year 2014 totaled $476.7 million. School Districts utilize CABs more frequently than other issuers of local debt, issuing 99% of total CABs issued in 2014. The Texas Municipal League indicated that based on the BRB's report, cities did not issue CABs very often in fiscal year 2014.School districts would not be able to issue CABs secured by ad valorem taxes that exceeded 25 percent of their bonded indebtedness at the time of issue; however, they would be able to issue refunding bonds for cost savings or transportation projects. Because total interest costs on CABs can be higher than current interests bonds, school districts may experience savings on the interest paid on bonds if they are limited from issuing CABs, with the exceptions of refunding bonds for cost savings or transportation projects. School districts that have interest and sinking (I&S) rates at or near $0.50 may experience challenges issuing debt.
Source Agencies: 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 701 Central Education Agency
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 701 Central Education Agency
LBB Staff: UP, KVe, SD, EK, JBi, ED
UP, KVe, SD, EK, JBi, ED