Texas 2015 84th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB627 House Committee Report / Analysis

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    BILL ANALYSIS             S.B. 627     By: Huffman     Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence     Committee Report (Unamended)             BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE    Advocates note that Texas courts have generally recognized a defense to a libel action for news media organizations when they accurately report on third-party allegations regarding matters of public concern. These advocates point out that one need look no further than several recent reports of questionable activities in public entities to know that all too often it is the media that first uncovers problems that need to be investigated or for which there needs to be legislative reform. A recent court case called into question the prior interpretation of this defense and left the question unsettled and for the legislature to address. S.B. 627 seeks to address this issue.       CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT   It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.       RULEMAKING AUTHORITY    It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.       ANALYSIS    S.B. 627 amends the Civil Practice and Remedies Code to make the defense to a libel action that a published statement is the truth applicable to a libel action relating to an accurate reporting of allegations made by a third party regarding a matter of public concern in an action brought against a newspaper or other periodical or broadcaster. The bill establishes that such a defense does not abrogate or lessen any other remedy, right, cause of action, defense, immunity, or privilege available under the United States or Texas Constitutions or as provided by any statute, case, or common law or rule.        EFFECTIVE DATE    On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.          

BILL ANALYSIS

# BILL ANALYSIS

 

 

 

S.B. 627
By: Huffman
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
Committee Report (Unamended)

S.B. 627

By: Huffman

Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Committee Report (Unamended)

 

 

 

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE    Advocates note that Texas courts have generally recognized a defense to a libel action for news media organizations when they accurately report on third-party allegations regarding matters of public concern. These advocates point out that one need look no further than several recent reports of questionable activities in public entities to know that all too often it is the media that first uncovers problems that need to be investigated or for which there needs to be legislative reform. A recent court case called into question the prior interpretation of this defense and left the question unsettled and for the legislature to address. S.B. 627 seeks to address this issue.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT   It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY    It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
ANALYSIS    S.B. 627 amends the Civil Practice and Remedies Code to make the defense to a libel action that a published statement is the truth applicable to a libel action relating to an accurate reporting of allegations made by a third party regarding a matter of public concern in an action brought against a newspaper or other periodical or broadcaster. The bill establishes that such a defense does not abrogate or lessen any other remedy, right, cause of action, defense, immunity, or privilege available under the United States or Texas Constitutions or as provided by any statute, case, or common law or rule.
EFFECTIVE DATE    On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE 

 

Advocates note that Texas courts have generally recognized a defense to a libel action for news media organizations when they accurately report on third-party allegations regarding matters of public concern. These advocates point out that one need look no further than several recent reports of questionable activities in public entities to know that all too often it is the media that first uncovers problems that need to be investigated or for which there needs to be legislative reform. A recent court case called into question the prior interpretation of this defense and left the question unsettled and for the legislature to address. S.B. 627 seeks to address this issue.

 

CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT

 

It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.

 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY 

 

It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.

 

ANALYSIS 

 

S.B. 627 amends the Civil Practice and Remedies Code to make the defense to a libel action that a published statement is the truth applicable to a libel action relating to an accurate reporting of allegations made by a third party regarding a matter of public concern in an action brought against a newspaper or other periodical or broadcaster. The bill establishes that such a defense does not abrogate or lessen any other remedy, right, cause of action, defense, immunity, or privilege available under the United States or Texas Constitutions or as provided by any statute, case, or common law or rule. 

 

EFFECTIVE DATE 

 

On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.