Texas 2015 84th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB705 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            March 16, 2015      TO: Honorable Kevin Eltife, Chair, Senate Committee on Business & Commerce      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB705 by Uresti (Relating to the review of and notifications regarding certain state contracts.), As Introduced    The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined at this time because the number of contracts that would be subject to the review required by the bill is unknown.  The bill would require the Contract Advisory Team (CAT) to review certain state agency contract changes, extensions, or renewals that result in a change of 20 percent or more to the value of the contract. The CAT would determine whether the action changing the value of the contract is justified. If the team determines that the action is not justified, the contract must be reported to the state Comptroller of Public Accounts (CPA), who must then report to the Legislative Budget Board and the Legislature.The CPA estimates that there would be a cost to implement the provisions of the bill. However, the number of contracts statewide that would be subject to these new review requirements is unknown and therefore the cost cannot be determined at this time; depending on the volume of contracts in question, costs could be significant.  Local Government Impact No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:302 Office of the Attorney General, 303 Facilities Commission, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 313 Department of Information Resources, 529 Health and Human Services Commission, 696 Department of Criminal Justice   LBB Staff:  UP, CL, JJ, KMc, JN, JI, TBo    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 84TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 16, 2015





  TO: Honorable Kevin Eltife, Chair, Senate Committee on Business & Commerce      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB705 by Uresti (Relating to the review of and notifications regarding certain state contracts.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Kevin Eltife, Chair, Senate Committee on Business & Commerce
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB705 by Uresti (Relating to the review of and notifications regarding certain state contracts.), As Introduced

 Honorable Kevin Eltife, Chair, Senate Committee on Business & Commerce 

 Honorable Kevin Eltife, Chair, Senate Committee on Business & Commerce 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

SB705 by Uresti (Relating to the review of and notifications regarding certain state contracts.), As Introduced

SB705 by Uresti (Relating to the review of and notifications regarding certain state contracts.), As Introduced



The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined at this time because the number of contracts that would be subject to the review required by the bill is unknown.

The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined at this time because the number of contracts that would be subject to the review required by the bill is unknown.



The bill would require the Contract Advisory Team (CAT) to review certain state agency contract changes, extensions, or renewals that result in a change of 20 percent or more to the value of the contract. The CAT would determine whether the action changing the value of the contract is justified. If the team determines that the action is not justified, the contract must be reported to the state Comptroller of Public Accounts (CPA), who must then report to the Legislative Budget Board and the Legislature.The CPA estimates that there would be a cost to implement the provisions of the bill. However, the number of contracts statewide that would be subject to these new review requirements is unknown and therefore the cost cannot be determined at this time; depending on the volume of contracts in question, costs could be significant. 

Local Government Impact

No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 302 Office of the Attorney General, 303 Facilities Commission, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 313 Department of Information Resources, 529 Health and Human Services Commission, 696 Department of Criminal Justice

302 Office of the Attorney General, 303 Facilities Commission, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 313 Department of Information Resources, 529 Health and Human Services Commission, 696 Department of Criminal Justice

LBB Staff: UP, CL, JJ, KMc, JN, JI, TBo

 UP, CL, JJ, KMc, JN, JI, TBo