LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 24, 2017 TO: Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair, House Committee on Insurance FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1161 by Davis, Sarah (Relating to health benefit plan coverage of prescription contraceptive drugs.), As Introduced Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB1161, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($4,565,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2019. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 24, 2017
TO: Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair, House Committee on Insurance FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1161 by Davis, Sarah (Relating to health benefit plan coverage of prescription contraceptive drugs.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair, House Committee on Insurance
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1161 by Davis, Sarah (Relating to health benefit plan coverage of prescription contraceptive drugs.), As Introduced
Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair, House Committee on Insurance
Honorable Larry Phillips, Chair, House Committee on Insurance
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB1161 by Davis, Sarah (Relating to health benefit plan coverage of prescription contraceptive drugs.), As Introduced
HB1161 by Davis, Sarah (Relating to health benefit plan coverage of prescription contraceptive drugs.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB1161, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($4,565,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2019. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB1161, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($4,565,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2019.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds 2018 $0 2019 ($4,565,000) 2020 ($4,905,000) 2021 ($5,268,000) 2022 ($5,660,000)
2018 $0
2019 ($4,565,000)
2020 ($4,905,000)
2021 ($5,268,000)
2022 ($5,660,000)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGR Dedicated Accounts994 Probable Savings/(Cost) fromFederal Funds555 Probable Savings/(Cost) fromState Highway Fund6 2018 $0 $0 $0 $0 2019 ($4,565,000) ($168,000) ($682,000) ($465,000) 2020 ($4,905,000) ($181,000) ($733,000) ($500,000) 2021 ($5,268,000) ($194,000) ($788,000) ($537,000) 2022 ($5,660,000) ($207,000) ($846,000) ($576,000) Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromOther Special State Funds998 Probable Savings/(Cost) fromAll Local Units of Government 2018 $0 $0 2019 ($20,000) ($206,000) 2020 ($21,000) ($221,000) 2021 ($23,000) ($238,000) 2022 ($25,000) ($255,000)
Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGR Dedicated Accounts994 Probable Savings/(Cost) fromFederal Funds555 Probable Savings/(Cost) fromState Highway Fund6 2018 $0 $0 $0 $0 2019 ($4,565,000) ($168,000) ($682,000) ($465,000) 2020 ($4,905,000) ($181,000) ($733,000) ($500,000) 2021 ($5,268,000) ($194,000) ($788,000) ($537,000) 2022 ($5,660,000) ($207,000) ($846,000) ($576,000)
2018 $0 $0 $0 $0
2019 ($4,565,000) ($168,000) ($682,000) ($465,000)
2020 ($4,905,000) ($181,000) ($733,000) ($500,000)
2021 ($5,268,000) ($194,000) ($788,000) ($537,000)
2022 ($5,660,000) ($207,000) ($846,000) ($576,000)
Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromOther Special State Funds998 Probable Savings/(Cost) fromAll Local Units of Government 2018 $0 $0 2019 ($20,000) ($206,000) 2020 ($21,000) ($221,000) 2021 ($23,000) ($238,000) 2022 ($25,000) ($255,000)
2018 $0 $0
2019 ($20,000) ($206,000)
2020 ($21,000) ($221,000)
2021 ($23,000) ($238,000)
2022 ($25,000) ($255,000)
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would amend the Insurance Code to require health benefit plans to provide up to a 12-month supply of prescription contraceptive drugs at one time.The bill would take effect September 1, 2017, but only apply to plans that are delivered, issued for delivery, or renewed on or after January 1, 2018.
Methodology
The Employees Retirement System indicates that there would be a fiscal impact to the state's employee health plans due to expected wastage from dispensed but unused products and products dispensed to participants who receive a 12-month supply but then leave the plan. The results of the actuarial and fiscal analysis are included in the table above and do account for some offsetting medical cost savings from avoided maternal and pediatric care. The analysis also includes participants in HealthSelect as well as Health Maintenance Organizations, health care cost trends, and also separates out the plan's costs for state agencies ($4.1 million in All Funds in fiscal year 2019) and for higher education ($1.8 million in All Funds for fiscal year 2019). According to the Health and Human Services Commission, any cost to Medicaid would be offset by savings related to averted births and reduced costs for prescriptions provided through the Healthy Texas Women program, which are not eligible for federal matching funds. Costs to the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) would be minimal because coverage of prescription contraceptives is limited to uses other than the prevention of pregnancy.According to the Teacher Retirement System, the bill would result in increased costs to the ActiveCare plan. The University of Texas System indicates that the impact of the bill would be minimal, but difficult to predict due to numerous unknown factors.The Department of Insurance anticipates that it could absorb any cost of the bill within existing resources.
Local Government Impact
According to the Department of Insurance, no fiscal implication to local government is anticipated. According to the Texas Association of Counties, the fiscal impact is not anticipated to be significant.According to the Texas Municipal League, the fiscal impact is not anticipated to be significant.
Source Agencies: 323 Teacher Retirement System, 327 Employees Retirement System, 454 Department of Insurance, 529 Health and Human Services Commission, 710 Texas A&M University System Administrative and General Offices, 720 The University of Texas System Administration
323 Teacher Retirement System, 327 Employees Retirement System, 454 Department of Insurance, 529 Health and Human Services Commission, 710 Texas A&M University System Administrative and General Offices, 720 The University of Texas System Administration
LBB Staff: UP, AG, NV, KFa, TSI, TBo, JGA
UP, AG, NV, KFa, TSI, TBo, JGA