LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 11, 2017 TO: Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1211 by Phillips (Relating to the additional tax imposed on land appraised for ad valorem tax purposes as qualified open-space land if a change in use of the land occurs.), As Introduced Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB1211, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($15,083,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2019.Additionally, there will be a cost of ($46,441,000) beginning in fiscal year 2020. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 11, 2017
TO: Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1211 by Phillips (Relating to the additional tax imposed on land appraised for ad valorem tax purposes as qualified open-space land if a change in use of the land occurs.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1211 by Phillips (Relating to the additional tax imposed on land appraised for ad valorem tax purposes as qualified open-space land if a change in use of the land occurs.), As Introduced
Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB1211 by Phillips (Relating to the additional tax imposed on land appraised for ad valorem tax purposes as qualified open-space land if a change in use of the land occurs.), As Introduced
HB1211 by Phillips (Relating to the additional tax imposed on land appraised for ad valorem tax purposes as qualified open-space land if a change in use of the land occurs.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB1211, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($15,083,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2019.Additionally, there will be a cost of ($46,441,000) beginning in fiscal year 2020. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB1211, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($15,083,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2019.Additionally, there will be a cost of ($46,441,000) beginning in fiscal year 2020.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds 2018 ($99,000) 2019 ($14,984,000) 2020 ($46,441,000) 2021 ($48,348,000) 2022 ($50,350,000)
2018 ($99,000)
2019 ($14,984,000)
2020 ($46,441,000)
2021 ($48,348,000)
2022 ($50,350,000)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromFoundation School Fund193 Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromSchool Districts Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromCounties Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromOther Special Districts 2018 ($99,000) ($19,955,000) ($5,910,000) ($4,466,000) 2019 ($14,984,000) ($48,185,000) ($18,533,000) ($13,986,000) 2020 ($46,441,000) ($19,887,000) ($19,373,000) ($14,598,000) 2021 ($48,348,000) ($21,296,000) ($20,250,000) ($15,237,000) 2022 ($50,350,000) ($22,776,000) ($21,167,000) ($15,902,000)
Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromFoundation School Fund193 Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromSchool Districts Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromCounties Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) fromOther Special Districts 2018 ($99,000) ($19,955,000) ($5,910,000) ($4,466,000) 2019 ($14,984,000) ($48,185,000) ($18,533,000) ($13,986,000) 2020 ($46,441,000) ($19,887,000) ($19,373,000) ($14,598,000) 2021 ($48,348,000) ($21,296,000) ($20,250,000) ($15,237,000) 2022 ($50,350,000) ($22,776,000) ($21,167,000) ($15,902,000)
2018 ($99,000) ($19,955,000) ($5,910,000) ($4,466,000)
2019 ($14,984,000) ($48,185,000) ($18,533,000) ($13,986,000)
2020 ($46,441,000) ($19,887,000) ($19,373,000) ($14,598,000)
2021 ($48,348,000) ($21,296,000) ($20,250,000) ($15,237,000)
2022 ($50,350,000) ($22,776,000) ($21,167,000) ($15,902,000)
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would amend Chapter 23 of the Tax Code, regarding property tax appraisal methods and procedures, to provide that if the use of qualified open-space land changes to a non-qualifying use, an additional tax is imposed equal to the difference in the taxes that would have been paid at market value and the taxes that were actually paid over the past three years (rather than five years) plus interest calculated at 5 percent (rather than 7 percent). The bill would take effect September 1, 2017.
Methodology
Land qualified for special open space appraisal is appraised at a value significantly less than its market value. Under current law if the use of qualified land changes to a non-qualifying use the landowner must pay an additional tax based on the sum of the taxes that the landowner avoided over the preceding five years by paying taxes on the special appraised value instead of the market value, plus interest (ag rollback). The bill's reduction of the ag rollback period from five years to three years would create a cost to local taxing units and to the state through the school finance formulas in regard to the reduction in the additional rollback tax. The reduction in the additional rollback interest would not affect the state because interest is not included in the school finance formulas. The losses were estimated based on information from appraisal districts and projected through the five-year period. Under provisions of the Education Code, the school district tax revenue loss is partially transferred to the state. Projected school funding rates were applied to estimate the state loss and the net school district loss. Cities were excluded from the table below because little agricultural land is in cities.
Local Government Impact
The estimated fiscal implication to units of local government is reflected in the table above. Cities were excluded from the table because little agricultural land is in cities.
Source Agencies: 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff: UP, KK, SD, SJS
UP, KK, SD, SJS