LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 14, 2017 TO: Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1370 by Springer (Relating to sales and use tax information provided to certain local governmental entities.), As Introduced Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB1370, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($400,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2019.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 14, 2017
TO: Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1370 by Springer (Relating to sales and use tax information provided to certain local governmental entities.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1370 by Springer (Relating to sales and use tax information provided to certain local governmental entities.), As Introduced
Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB1370 by Springer (Relating to sales and use tax information provided to certain local governmental entities.), As Introduced
HB1370 by Springer (Relating to sales and use tax information provided to certain local governmental entities.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB1370, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($400,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2019.
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB1370, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($400,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2019.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds 2018 ($200,000) 2019 ($200,000) 2020 ($200,000) 2021 ($200,000) 2022 ($200,000)
2018 ($200,000)
2019 ($200,000)
2020 ($200,000)
2021 ($200,000)
2022 ($200,000)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable (Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2017 2018 ($200,000) 3.0 2019 ($200,000) 3.0 2020 ($200,000) 3.0 2021 ($200,000) 3.0 2022 ($200,000) 3.0
Fiscal Year Probable (Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2017 2018 ($200,000) 3.0 2019 ($200,000) 3.0 2020 ($200,000) 3.0 2021 ($200,000) 3.0 2022 ($200,000) 3.0
2018 ($200,000) 3.0
2019 ($200,000) 3.0
2020 ($200,000) 3.0
2021 ($200,000) 3.0
2022 ($200,000) 3.0
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would amend Chapters 321 and 323 of the Tax Code, regarding confidential taxpayer information that must be provided to certain local governmental entities. Section 321.3022(a-1) would be amended to provide that, on the request of a municipality or other local governmental entity that imposes tax under Chapter 321 (Municipal Sales and Use Tax Act), the Comptroller would provide information on the gross sales, taxable sales, and taxable purchases by individual outlet of businesses in the taxing jurisdiction. A parallel amendment of Section 323.3022(b) would be made, with respect to information that must be provided to a county or other local governmental entity that imposes tax under Chapter 323 (County Sales and Use Tax Act). Section 321.3022(a-2) would be amended to provide that, on the request of a municipality or other local governmental entity with a population less than 150,000 that imposes tax under the chapter, the Comptroller would provide information on the amount of tax paid to the municipality or other entity by any business in the jurisdiction that annually remits state and local sales tax payments of more than $100. The $100 threshold is a reduction from a threshold of $500 in current law with respect to requests for such information by municipal taxing jurisdictions that do not impose an ad valorem tax. The bill would repeal Subsections (c) and (d) of Section 321.3022 and Subsections (d) and (e) of Section 323.3022. These Subsections limit the provision of taxpayer information by the Comptroller to municipalities, counties, and other local sales taxing jurisdictions to aggregate totals for all persons doing business in certain areas of the jurisdictions, such that individual tax payments are not disclosed. The bill would take effect September 1, 2017.
Methodology
The provisions of the bill relate to disclosure of individually identifiable taxpayer information by the Comptroller to local taxing jurisdictions, but do not alter tax liabilities of persons subject to local sales taxes. Accordingly the bill would have no revenue implications.The administrative cost estimate reflects the funds that would be necessary to hire three accounts examiners to handle the anticipated increase in information requests. Current law requires the Comptroller's Office to provide municipalities aggregated quarterly municipal sales and use tax reports. The bill adds tax information on gross sales, taxable sales, and taxable purchases by individual outlets of businesses in the taxing jurisdiction and lowers the remittance threshold of businesses included in the report from $500 to $100. The bill would also require that the amount of tax paid be supplied to all municipalities with a population less than 150,000 (all but 16 of the more than 1,100 municipalities in the state).
Local Government Impact
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff: UP, KK, SD, LCO
UP, KK, SD, LCO