Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Texas House Bill HB1784

Filed
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the period during which an action alleging a violation of the open meetings law may be brought.

Impact

The introduction of HB1784 could significantly alter the enforcement landscape of open meetings regulations within Texas. By setting a definitive two-year period for bringing forth legal actions, the bill seeks to provide predictability and legal certainty for both governmental entities and the public. This change may encourage more individuals to pursue actions against potential violations, knowing that there is a clear timeframe established. However, it may also limit the ability of some individuals to seek justice if they are unaware of a violation within the stipulated period.

Summary

House Bill 1784 aims to establish a clear limitations period for legal actions alleging violations of the open meetings law in Texas. Specifically, the bill requires that any suit enforcing Section 551.141 or an action under Section 551.142 must be brought within two years of the date the alleged violation occurred or was reasonably discovered. This amendment is intended to enhance clarity surrounding the timeframe for individuals or entities to seek redress for potential violations of open meetings regulations.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB1784 appears to be supportive, particularly among proponents of government accountability and transparency. Supporters argue that by defining the timeline for legal actions, the bill promotes a more straightforward approach to enforcement of the open meetings law. However, there may be concerns about the potential barriers this presents for those who may not have immediate access to information or resources needed to assert a claim within the two-year timeframe.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the implications for public access to government proceedings and the ability of individuals or advocacy groups to monitor and challenge violations effectively. Critics could argue that establishing a rigid statute of limitations might inadvertently shield government bodies from accountability, particularly in situations where violations are not immediately discoverable. Thus, while the bill establishes clearer parameters for legal actions, it raises important questions about the balance between legal certainty and the protection of the public's right to challenge government transparency issues.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

TX HB2850

Relating to discovery procedures for civil actions brought under the Family Code.

TX HB705

Relating to defense of certain actions brought against election judges and clerks.

TX SB42

Relating to remote and other meetings held under the open meetings law.

TX HB5214

Relating to actions brought by the attorney general on behalf of certain persons under the Texas Free Enterprise and Antitrust Act of 1983.

TX HB4357

Relating to the persons who must be physically present for certain remote meetings under the open meetings law.

TX HB2342

Relating to a limitation on certain civil actions brought against persons licensed by the Texas Funeral Service Commission.

TX HB4179

Relating to assertion of immunity and application of certain laws in certain actions brought against peace officers.

TX HB2141

Relating to a hearing for an alleged violation of community supervision by a defendant and the manner in which that defendant is required to appear before the court.

TX HB4268

Relating to the period during which an employee may file a claim for unpaid wages with the Texas Workforce Commission.

TX HB4038

Relating to the limitations period for actions challenging and validations regarding municipal annexation.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.