LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 7, 2017 TO: Honorable Dan Flynn, Chair, House Committee on Pensions FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1998 by Lozano (Relating to participation in and rates for coverage provided under the uniform group coverage program for active school employees.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. However, the bill would likely result in increased costs for the ActiveCare program that would be passed along to school districts and participating employees in the form of increased premiums and plan design changes. The bill would authorize TRS, by rule, to establish a regional rating method for determining premiums charged in different regions of the state for benefits offered by TRS-ActiveCare. The bill would also expand participation in the program to include risk pools as well as school districts, and would allow both school districts and risk pools to opt out of the ActiveCare program. The bill would not have a significant fiscal impact on TRS and any administrative costs could be absorbed within existing resources. However, the bill would result in increased program costs that would be passed along to school districts and participating employees in the form of increased premiums and plan design changes. Local Government Impact TRS reports that implementing a regional rating method would result in some employees paying more for the same health coverage as others depending on the rates available in different geographical regions. Regional rating would also increase the volatility of future employee premiums, since it would set premiums based on regional costs rather than on statewide plan experience. TRS estimates that approximately 62 percent of ActiveCare participants could experience a rate increase as a result of regional rating.The bill could also cause adverse selection due to the provision that allows districts and risk pools to opt out of the program. If districts opted out of ActiveCare, the rates for districts remaining in the plan would increase. This dynamic is anticipated because districts with the best utilization experience are more likely to opt out, while districts or risk pools with high utilization and high costs are more likely to remain in ActiveCare. Increased program costs would be passed along to districts and participating employees in the form of increased premiums and plan design changes. Source Agencies:323 Teacher Retirement System LBB Staff: UP, AG, AM, TSI
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 7, 2017
TO: Honorable Dan Flynn, Chair, House Committee on Pensions FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1998 by Lozano (Relating to participation in and rates for coverage provided under the uniform group coverage program for active school employees.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Dan Flynn, Chair, House Committee on Pensions
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1998 by Lozano (Relating to participation in and rates for coverage provided under the uniform group coverage program for active school employees.), As Introduced
Honorable Dan Flynn, Chair, House Committee on Pensions
Honorable Dan Flynn, Chair, House Committee on Pensions
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB1998 by Lozano (Relating to participation in and rates for coverage provided under the uniform group coverage program for active school employees.), As Introduced
HB1998 by Lozano (Relating to participation in and rates for coverage provided under the uniform group coverage program for active school employees.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. However, the bill would likely result in increased costs for the ActiveCare program that would be passed along to school districts and participating employees in the form of increased premiums and plan design changes.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. However, the bill would likely result in increased costs for the ActiveCare program that would be passed along to school districts and participating employees in the form of increased premiums and plan design changes.
The bill would authorize TRS, by rule, to establish a regional rating method for determining premiums charged in different regions of the state for benefits offered by TRS-ActiveCare. The bill would also expand participation in the program to include risk pools as well as school districts, and would allow both school districts and risk pools to opt out of the ActiveCare program. The bill would not have a significant fiscal impact on TRS and any administrative costs could be absorbed within existing resources. However, the bill would result in increased program costs that would be passed along to school districts and participating employees in the form of increased premiums and plan design changes.
Local Government Impact
TRS reports that implementing a regional rating method would result in some employees paying more for the same health coverage as others depending on the rates available in different geographical regions. Regional rating would also increase the volatility of future employee premiums, since it would set premiums based on regional costs rather than on statewide plan experience. TRS estimates that approximately 62 percent of ActiveCare participants could experience a rate increase as a result of regional rating.The bill could also cause adverse selection due to the provision that allows districts and risk pools to opt out of the program. If districts opted out of ActiveCare, the rates for districts remaining in the plan would increase. This dynamic is anticipated because districts with the best utilization experience are more likely to opt out, while districts or risk pools with high utilization and high costs are more likely to remain in ActiveCare. Increased program costs would be passed along to districts and participating employees in the form of increased premiums and plan design changes.
Source Agencies: 323 Teacher Retirement System
323 Teacher Retirement System
LBB Staff: UP, AG, AM, TSI
UP, AG, AM, TSI