Texas House Bill HB2070

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to the enforcement of certain warranties for a new motor vehicle.

Impact

The implications of HB 2070 are significant for Texas consumers and manufacturers. By clarifying the warranty enforcement processes, the bill seeks to ensure that consumers are adequately protected when they purchase a new vehicle, particularly if the vehicle has persistent defects. The changes to the Occupations Code will empower consumers to seek refunds or replacements more effectively when dealing with nonconforming vehicles, potentially reducing disputes and promoting fair practices in auto sales.

Summary

House Bill 2070 addresses issues related to the enforcement of warrants for new motor vehicles, specifically focusing on defining the conditions under which a vehicle may be considered a 'lemon'. This includes establishing clear criteria for what constitutes a reasonable number of repair attempts and extends the timeframe for repairs associated with warranty claims. The bill aims to enhance consumer protections by providing a clearer framework for both manufacturers and consumers regarding defective vehicles, thereby improving accountability in the automotive industry.

Sentiment

The sentiment around the bill appears largely positive among consumer advocacy groups who feel that it strengthens protections for buyers of new motor vehicles. Meanwhile, manufacturers have expressed concerns about the potential increase in the number of claims filed against them, viewing the legislation as potentially over-regulating their operational practices. This duel perspective highlights the ongoing tension between consumer protection and the regulatory burdens faced by businesses.

Contention

Notable points of contention during discussions surrounding HB 2070 included the criteria for defining nonconformity and the acceptable number of repair attempts before a vehicle is deemed defective. Manufacturers argued that the set criteria may lead to excessive claims, while advocates for consumers maintained that the legislation is necessary to ensure that consumers do not suffer due to faulty vehicles. This dispute underscores the challenges in balancing consumer rights with industry concerns in legislative processes.