Texas House Bill HB2648

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to including the obligations of Federal Home Loan Banks as authorized investments for a governmental entity.

Impact

The impact of HB2648 on state laws is significant as it broadens the types of financial instruments that governmental entities can utilize for investing their available funds. By incorporating obligations from Federal Home Loan Banks into the authorized list, the bill aims to increase the security and yield of investments that public entities can pursue. This change may enable local governments to diversify their investment portfolios and could result in better management of taxpayer money.

Summary

House Bill 2648 aims to expand the scope of authorized investments for governmental entities in Texas by including the obligations of Federal Home Loan Banks. This amendment to Section 2256.009(a) of the Government Code allows local governments to consider these obligations as acceptable investments, alongside currently authorized federal obligations and other state investments. The primary purpose of this bill is to enhance the investment options available to governmental entities, potentially leading to better financial outcomes for public funds.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB2648 appears to be positive, as it was passed unanimously in the legislative vote with 144 yeas and no nays. Proponents of the bill likely believe that this legislation will allow local government entities to engage in more strategic financial planning and provide more options in managing their investment strategies. Given the broad support, it's indicative that stakeholders see the benefits of expanding investment opportunities for public funds.

Contention

While no formal opposition to HB2648 was recorded during the discussions, the inclusion of Federal Home Loan Banks' obligations as authorized investments could raise concerns in some areas regarding the risk assessments involved. Decisions about investments often come with considerations about credit risk, liquidity, and overall financial strategy, which could necessitate further discussions on guidelines and oversight to ensure these investments are made prudently. However, the positive vote indicates that concerns did not deter legislative support.