Texas House Bill HB26

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to the establishment of the Texas Board of Behavior Analyst Examiners and the requirement to obtain a license to practice as a behavior analyst or assistant behavior analyst; imposing fees; providing an administrative penalty; providing a civil penalty; creating a criminal offense.

Impact

The bill significantly modifies Texas state law by introducing a structured licensing system for behavior analysts, who previously operated without formal oversight. This move is designed to enhance consumer protection by setting educational and professional standards, requiring behavior analysts to be certified by a recognized body, and establishing a clear disciplinary framework for unlicensed practice and ethical violations. The administrative penalties are set to deter violations, ensuring that services provided are of high quality and conducted by competent professionals.

Summary

House Bill 26 establishes the Texas Board of Behavior Analyst Examiners, which is tasked with the licensing of behavior analysts and assistant behavior analysts. The bill's introduction is in response to the increasing demand for behavior analysis services and aims to create a regulatory framework that ensures practitioners meet specific standards. The key provisions of the bill include requirements for obtaining a license, administrative penalties for violations, and the establishment of certification standards, which aim to protect public welfare and ensure quality practice in the field of applied behavior analysis.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 26 include discussions on the necessity of such licensing regulations, with some stakeholders concerned about potential barriers to entry for new practitioners in the field. Critics argue that the bill could limit access to behavior analysis services, especially in underserved areas where practitioners are scarce. Additionally, there are concerns regarding the definition of violations and the potential for penalties that may disproportionately affect those who are trying to enter the field. These discussions reflect a balance between protecting the public and maintaining accessible services.