Texas 2017 85th Regular

Texas House Bill HB3069 House Committee Report / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            May 1, 2017      TO: Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3069 by White (Relating to the administration of and eligibility for participation in a veterans treatment court program and the issuance of orders of nondisclosure for certain participants who successfully complete that program.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Government Code relating to the administration of and eligibility for participation in a veterans treatment court program.  The bill would allow defendants to enter the program both pre-adjudication and post-adjudication, and would allow a court to dismiss the case against a defendant in certain circumstances.  The bill would allow certain defendants who had successfully completed the program to petition the court for an order of nondisclosure after a certain time.  The court would be required to grant such a request for nondisclosure under certain circumstances.  The bill would require a court to issue an order prohibiting criminal justice agencies from disclosing to the public criminal history record information related to the offense for which the person entered the program. Based on the analysis of the Office of Court Administration, duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be accomplished using existing resources. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council   LBB Staff:  UP, JGA, LBO, PBO    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 1, 2017





  TO: Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3069 by White (Relating to the administration of and eligibility for participation in a veterans treatment court program and the issuance of orders of nondisclosure for certain participants who successfully complete that program.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted  

TO: Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3069 by White (Relating to the administration of and eligibility for participation in a veterans treatment court program and the issuance of orders of nondisclosure for certain participants who successfully complete that program.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

 Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence 

 Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB3069 by White (Relating to the administration of and eligibility for participation in a veterans treatment court program and the issuance of orders of nondisclosure for certain participants who successfully complete that program.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

HB3069 by White (Relating to the administration of and eligibility for participation in a veterans treatment court program and the issuance of orders of nondisclosure for certain participants who successfully complete that program.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Government Code relating to the administration of and eligibility for participation in a veterans treatment court program.  The bill would allow defendants to enter the program both pre-adjudication and post-adjudication, and would allow a court to dismiss the case against a defendant in certain circumstances.  The bill would allow certain defendants who had successfully completed the program to petition the court for an order of nondisclosure after a certain time.  The court would be required to grant such a request for nondisclosure under certain circumstances.  The bill would require a court to issue an order prohibiting criminal justice agencies from disclosing to the public criminal history record information related to the offense for which the person entered the program. Based on the analysis of the Office of Court Administration, duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be accomplished using existing resources.

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council

212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council

LBB Staff: UP, JGA, LBO, PBO

 UP, JGA, LBO, PBO