Texas House Bill HB3223

Texas 2017 - 85th Regular

Caption

Relating to liability for the sale or transfer of law enforcement vehicles before removal of certain equipment and insignia; providing civil penalties.

Impact

The bill introduces civil penalties for entities that violate these regulations. If a marked vehicle is sold or transferred without proper equipment removal, the seller can be held liable for damages incurred during a crime committed with the vehicle. Additionally, the attorney general is granted the authority to pursue civil penalties against offenders, which may be up to $1,000. This aspect of the bill reinforces accountability and the need for due diligence in the sale of police vehicles.

Summary

House Bill 3223 focuses on the liability associated with the sale or transfer of marked patrol cars or law enforcement vehicles. The bill makes it illegal to sell or transfer these vehicles to the public unless all distinguishing equipment and insignia that might mislead the buyer into thinking the vehicle is still a law enforcement vehicle are completely removed. This measure aims to prevent any misrepresentation and potential misuse of former law enforcement vehicles in criminal activities.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB3223 appears to be supportive, particularly among public safety advocates who view it as a necessary protective measure. Legislators express consensus on the importance of ensuring that former law enforcement vehicles are not misrepresented and that public safety is prioritized. There do not appear to be notable points of contention expressed during discussions or voting processes regarding this bill.

Contention

The main contention surrounding HB3223 lies in balancing the need for public safety against the interests of local governments or organizations that may wish to repurpose former law enforcement vehicles. Opponents might argue about the potential administrative burdens or costs involved in complying with the removal regulations. However, concrete instances of opposition or significant controversy have not been documented in the available discussions surrounding the bill.