LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 14, 2017 TO: Honorable Dan Flynn, Chair, House Committee on Pensions FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB3263 by Rodriguez, Justin (Relating to the service retirement annuity for certain members of the Judicial Retirement System of Texas Plan Two who resume service.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend Government Code to allow a retired judge to elect to rejoin and receive service credit in the Judicial Retirement System Plan Two (JRS-II) if the retiree has been separated from judicial service for at least 12 consecutive months. The Employees Retirement System (ERS) would re-compute the service retirement annuity of the retiree to include the retiree's additional service credit on the resumption of annuity payments that have been suspended and the retiree would be allowed to re-elect a service retirement annuity option as if the retiree were retiring for the first time. ERS anticipates that allowing retired judges to return to work and increase their service retirement annuity would increase the actuarially sound contribution rate for the JRS-II Retirement Fund by 0.06 percent, from 23.77 percent to 23.83 percent. This would require an increase in the state contribution totaling approximately $185,792 in General Revenue and $300,000 in All Funds for the biennium, as well as $159,793 to update benefit administration processing systems. It is anticipated that these costs could be absorbed within existing resources.Government Code, Section 840.106 requires that legislation providing additional benefits that increase the actuarial cost of JRS-II would require a state contribution at least equal to the normal cost plus an amount necessary to amortize the unfunded liabilities of the new benefit structure in under 31 years. Because the bill would increase benefits for the JRS-II fund, ERS estimates the state contribution would need to increase to 16.37 percent of payroll. ERS estimates overall costs to comply with statute totaling approximately $700,000 in fiscal years 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, and $800,000 in fiscal year 2021, as well as the one-time $159,793 systems costs mentioned previously.The bill would take effect September 1, 2017. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:327 Employees Retirement System LBB Staff: UP, KFa, AG, NV
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 14, 2017
TO: Honorable Dan Flynn, Chair, House Committee on Pensions FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB3263 by Rodriguez, Justin (Relating to the service retirement annuity for certain members of the Judicial Retirement System of Texas Plan Two who resume service.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
TO: Honorable Dan Flynn, Chair, House Committee on Pensions
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3263 by Rodriguez, Justin (Relating to the service retirement annuity for certain members of the Judicial Retirement System of Texas Plan Two who resume service.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
Honorable Dan Flynn, Chair, House Committee on Pensions
Honorable Dan Flynn, Chair, House Committee on Pensions
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB3263 by Rodriguez, Justin (Relating to the service retirement annuity for certain members of the Judicial Retirement System of Texas Plan Two who resume service.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
HB3263 by Rodriguez, Justin (Relating to the service retirement annuity for certain members of the Judicial Retirement System of Texas Plan Two who resume service.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend Government Code to allow a retired judge to elect to rejoin and receive service credit in the Judicial Retirement System Plan Two (JRS-II) if the retiree has been separated from judicial service for at least 12 consecutive months. The Employees Retirement System (ERS) would re-compute the service retirement annuity of the retiree to include the retiree's additional service credit on the resumption of annuity payments that have been suspended and the retiree would be allowed to re-elect a service retirement annuity option as if the retiree were retiring for the first time. ERS anticipates that allowing retired judges to return to work and increase their service retirement annuity would increase the actuarially sound contribution rate for the JRS-II Retirement Fund by 0.06 percent, from 23.77 percent to 23.83 percent. This would require an increase in the state contribution totaling approximately $185,792 in General Revenue and $300,000 in All Funds for the biennium, as well as $159,793 to update benefit administration processing systems. It is anticipated that these costs could be absorbed within existing resources.Government Code, Section 840.106 requires that legislation providing additional benefits that increase the actuarial cost of JRS-II would require a state contribution at least equal to the normal cost plus an amount necessary to amortize the unfunded liabilities of the new benefit structure in under 31 years. Because the bill would increase benefits for the JRS-II fund, ERS estimates the state contribution would need to increase to 16.37 percent of payroll. ERS estimates overall costs to comply with statute totaling approximately $700,000 in fiscal years 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, and $800,000 in fiscal year 2021, as well as the one-time $159,793 systems costs mentioned previously.The bill would take effect September 1, 2017.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 327 Employees Retirement System
327 Employees Retirement System
LBB Staff: UP, KFa, AG, NV
UP, KFa, AG, NV