Texas 2017 85th Regular

Texas House Bill HB3333 Introduced / Bill

Filed 03/14/2017

                    By: Isaac H.B. No. 3333


 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to permits for certain injection wells that are part of an
 aquifer storage and recovery project that transect a portion of the
 Edwards Aquifer.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1.  Sections 27.0516(b), (f), (h), and (k), Water
 Code, are amended to read as follows:
 (b)  This section applies only to the portion of the Edwards
 Aquifer that is within the geographic area circumscribed by the
 external boundaries of the Barton Springs-Edwards Aquifer
 Conservation District [but is not in that district's territory or
 the territory of the Edwards Aquifer Authority].
 (f)  The commission by general permit may authorize:
 (1)  an activity described by Subsection (e);
 (2)  an injection well that transects and isolates the
 saline portion of the Edwards Aquifer and terminates in a lower
 aquifer for the purpose of injecting:
 (A)  concentrate from a desalination facility; or
 (B)  fresh water as part of an engineered aquifer
 storage and recovery facility;
 (3)  an injection well that terminates in that part of
 the saline portion of the Edwards Aquifer that has a total dissolved
 solids concentration of more than 10,000 milligrams per liter for
 the purpose of injecting into the saline portion of the Edwards
 Aquifer:
 (A)  concentrate from a desalination facility,
 provided that the injection well must be at least three miles from
 the closest outlet of Barton Springs; or
 (B)  fresh water as part of an engineered aquifer
 and storage recovery facility, provided that each well used for
 injection or withdrawal from the facility must be at least three
 miles from the closest outlet of Barton Springs; [or]
 (4)  an injection well that transects or terminates in
 the Edwards Aquifer for:
 (A)  aquifer remediation;
 (B)  the injection of a nontoxic tracer dye as
 part of a hydrologic study; or
 (C)  another beneficial activity that is designed
 and undertaken for the purpose of increasing protection of an
 underground source of drinking water from pollution or other
 deleterious effects; or
 (5)  an injection well that transects the Edwards
 Aquifer provided that:
 (A)  the injection well isolates the Edwards
 Aquifer;
 (B)  the injected water meets the standards under
 the federal Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. Section 300f et
 seq.); and
 (C)  the injection well is part of an engineered
 aquifer storage and recovery facility owned and operated by a
 municipality.
 (h)  Rules adopted or a general permit issued under this
 section:
 (1)  must require that an injection well authorized by
 the rules or permit be monitored by means of:
 (A)  a monitoring well operated by the injection
 well owner if the commission determines that there is an
 underground source of drinking water in the area of review that is
 potentially affected by the injection well; or
 (B)  if Paragraph (A) does not apply, a monitoring
 well operated by a party other than the injection well owner,
 provided that all results of monitoring are promptly made available
 to the injection well owner;
 (2)  must ensure that an authorized activity will not
 result in the waste or pollution of fresh water;
 (3)  may not authorize an injection well under
 Subsection (f)(2), [or] (3), or (5) unless the well is initially
 associated with a small-scale research project designed to evaluate
 the long-term feasibility and safety of:
 (A)  the injection of concentrate from a
 desalination facility; or
 (B)  an aquifer storage and recovery project;
 (4)  must require any authorization granted to be
 renewed at least as frequently as every 10 years;
 (5)  must require that an injection well authorized
 under Subsection (f)(2)(A) or (3)(A) be monitored on an ongoing
 basis by or in coordination with the well owner and that the well
 owner file monitoring reports with the commission at least as
 frequently as every three months; and
 (6)  must ensure that any injection well authorized for
 the purpose of injecting concentrate from a desalination facility
 does not transect the fresh water portion of the Edwards Aquifer.
 (k)  Notwithstanding Subsection (h)(3), a general permit may
 authorize the owner of an injection well authorized under
 Subsection (f)(2), [or] (3), or (5) to continue operating the well
 for the purpose of implementing the desalination or engineered
 aquifer storage and recovery project following completion of the
 small-scale research project, provided that:
 (1)  the injection well owner timely submits the
 information collected as part of the research project, including
 monitoring reports and information regarding the environmental
 impact of the well, to the commission;
 (2)  the injection well owner, following the completion
 of studies and monitoring adequate to characterize risks to the
 fresh water portion of the Edwards Aquifer and other fresh water
 associated with the continued operation of the well, and at least 90
 days before the date the owner initiates commercial well
 operations, files with the commission a notice of intent to
 continue operation of the well after completion of the research
 project; and
 (3)  the commission, based on the studies and
 monitoring, the report provided by Texas State University--San
 Marcos under Subsection (l)(2), and any other reasonably available
 information, determines that continued operation of the injection
 well as described in the notice of intent does not pose an
 unreasonable risk to the fresh water portion of the Edwards Aquifer
 or other fresh water associated with the continued operation of the
 well.
 SECTION 2.  Section 27.0516(a)(1), Water Code, is amended to
 read as follows:
 (1)  "Edwards Aquifer" means that portion of an arcuate
 belt of porous, waterbearing limestones composed of the Edwards
 Formation, Georgetown Formation, Comanche Peak Formation, Salmon
 Peak Limestone, McKnight Formation, West Nueces Formation, Devil's
 River Limestone, Person Formation, Kainer Formation, and Edwards
 Group [trending from west to east to northeast through Kinney,
 Uvalde, Medina, Bexar, Kendall, Comal, Hays, Travis, and Williamson
 Counties].  The permeable aquifer units generally overlie the
 less-permeable Glen Rose Formation to the south[, overlie the
 less-permeable Comanche Peak and Walnut Formations north of the
 Colorado River,] and underlie the less-permeable Del Rio Clay
 regionally.
 SECTION 3.  This Act takes effect immediately if it receives
 a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as
 provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this
 Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this
 Act takes effect September 1, 2017.