LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 1, 2017 TO: Honorable Joe Moody, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB344 by Canales ( relating to criminal asset forfeiture proceedings.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB344, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2019.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 1, 2017
TO: Honorable Joe Moody, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB344 by Canales ( relating to criminal asset forfeiture proceedings.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
TO: Honorable Joe Moody, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB344 by Canales ( relating to criminal asset forfeiture proceedings.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
Honorable Joe Moody, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Honorable Joe Moody, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB344 by Canales ( relating to criminal asset forfeiture proceedings.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
HB344 by Canales ( relating to criminal asset forfeiture proceedings.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB344, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2019.
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB344, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2019.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds 2018 $0 2019 $0 2020 $0 2021 $0 2022 $0
2018 $0
2019 $0
2020 $0
2021 $0
2022 $0
All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromFederal Funds555 2018 ($1,031,729) 2019 ($1,031,729) 2020 ($1,031,729) 2021 ($1,031,729) 2022 ($1,031,729)
Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromFederal Funds555 2018 ($1,031,729) 2019 ($1,031,729) 2020 ($1,031,729) 2021 ($1,031,729) 2022 ($1,031,729)
2018 ($1,031,729)
2019 ($1,031,729)
2020 ($1,031,729)
2021 ($1,031,729)
2022 ($1,031,729)
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Parks and Wildlife Code to change the state's burden of proof in certain criminal asset forfeiture proceedings from the demonstration of "a preponderance of the evidence" to the demonstration of "clear and convincing evidence." The bill would also proscribe a law enforcement agency or attorney representing the state from transferring seized property to any federal law enforcement authority or other federal agency, or coordinating with the federal authority or agency regarding seized property, unless the value of the seized property exceeds $50,000, and the attorney representing the state determines that the activity giving rise to the applicable seizure is interstate in nature and sufficiently complex to justify the transfer, or the seized property may only be forfeited under federal law.The bill would take effect September 1, 2017.
Methodology
The Department of Public Safety (DPS) has indicated that the agency already follows a "clear and convincing" burden of proof in criminal asset forfeiture proceedings. It is therefore presumed the bill's requirement that a "clear and convincing" burden of proof be demonstrated in certain criminal asset forfeiture proceedings would not result in a decrease in the amount of assets being forfeited. However, it is also presumed the bill's requirements limiting the transfer of seized property to federal authorities would result in a decrease to the amount of federal seized funds awarded to DPS. DPS reports the agency was awarded federal seized funds of $17,195,487 in the last five years, for a yearly average of $3,439,098. DPS has estimated that 30 percent, or $1,031,729, of the seizures were from seizures below $50,000. This fiscal note estimates that federal seized funds awarded to DPS could be reduced by $1,031,729 per year.
Technology
No significant technology-related implications are anticipated.
Local Government Impact
According to the Houston Police Department, no fiscal impact is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 405 Department of Public Safety, 802 Parks and Wildlife Department
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 405 Department of Public Safety, 802 Parks and Wildlife Department
LBB Staff: UP, KJo, AI, JAW, JGA, PBO
UP, KJo, AI, JAW, JGA, PBO