Texas 2017 85th Regular

Texas House Bill HB53 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            March 13, 2017      TO: Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB53 by Romero, Jr. (Relating to settlement of claims and actions against a governmental unit.), As Introduced    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Civil Practice and Remedies Code by prohibiting certain settlement terms against a governmental unit and restricting the admissibility of certain evidence related to settlement negotiation. According to information provided by the Office of the Attorney General, the bill would prevent a governmental unit from using evidence of a settlement to defend against a suit arising out of the same facts. The bill would increase the costs associated with litigation as a result of eliminating defenses that would resolve all, or portions, of a suit without the need for protracted discovery and trial. It is anticipated that the timing to litigate and appeal cases impacted by the bill would make immediate impact unlikely. This analysis assumes that any costs associated with the implementation of the bill would be absorbed by the Office of the Attorney General and the Office of Court Administration using existing agency resources. The bill would go in to effect on September 1, 2017. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 302 Office of the Attorney General   LBB Staff:  UP, SLE, NV, JSm    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 13, 2017





  TO: Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB53 by Romero, Jr. (Relating to settlement of claims and actions against a governmental unit.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB53 by Romero, Jr. (Relating to settlement of claims and actions against a governmental unit.), As Introduced

 Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence 

 Honorable John T. Smithee, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB53 by Romero, Jr. (Relating to settlement of claims and actions against a governmental unit.), As Introduced

HB53 by Romero, Jr. (Relating to settlement of claims and actions against a governmental unit.), As Introduced



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Civil Practice and Remedies Code by prohibiting certain settlement terms against a governmental unit and restricting the admissibility of certain evidence related to settlement negotiation. According to information provided by the Office of the Attorney General, the bill would prevent a governmental unit from using evidence of a settlement to defend against a suit arising out of the same facts. The bill would increase the costs associated with litigation as a result of eliminating defenses that would resolve all, or portions, of a suit without the need for protracted discovery and trial. It is anticipated that the timing to litigate and appeal cases impacted by the bill would make immediate impact unlikely. This analysis assumes that any costs associated with the implementation of the bill would be absorbed by the Office of the Attorney General and the Office of Court Administration using existing agency resources. The bill would go in to effect on September 1, 2017.

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 302 Office of the Attorney General

212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 302 Office of the Attorney General

LBB Staff: UP, SLE, NV, JSm

 UP, SLE, NV, JSm