Texas 2017 85th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1714 Introduced / Bill

Filed 03/09/2017

                    85R12328 AJZ-D
 By: Hall S.B. No. 1714


 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to the expenditure of proceeds and property from and the
 state's burden of proof in asset forfeiture proceedings under the
 Code of Criminal Procedure.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1.  Article 59.02, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
 amended by amending Subsection (c) and adding Subsection (c-1) to
 read as follows:
 (c)  An owner or interest holder's interest in property may
 not be forfeited under this chapter if the owner or interest holder
 [proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the owner or
 interest holder] acquired and perfected the interest:
 (1)  before or during the act or omission giving rise to
 forfeiture or, if the property is real property, the owner or
 interest holder [he] acquired an ownership interest, security
 interest, or lien interest before a lis pendens notice was filed
 under Article 59.04(g), [of this code] and did not know or should
 not reasonably have known of the act or omission giving rise to the
 forfeiture or that it was likely to occur at or before the time of
 acquiring and perfecting the interest or, if the property is real
 property, at or before the time of acquiring the ownership
 interest, security interest, or lien interest; or
 (2)  after the act or omission giving rise to the
 forfeiture, but before the seizure of the property, and only if the
 owner or interest holder:
 (A)  was, at the time that the interest in the
 property was acquired, an owner or interest holder for value; and
 (B)  was without reasonable cause to believe that
 the property was contraband and did not purposefully avoid learning
 that the property was contraband.
 (c-1)  The state has the burden of proving by clear and
 convincing evidence that the circumstances described by Subsection
 (c) do not apply to property that is subject to seizure and
 forfeiture under this chapter.
 SECTION 2.  Article 59.02(h), Code of Criminal Procedure, is
 amended by amending Subdivision (1) and adding Subdivision (1-a) to
 read as follows:
 (1)  An owner or interest holder's interest in property
 may not be forfeited under this chapter if [at the forfeiture
 hearing the owner or interest holder proves by a preponderance of
 the evidence that] the owner or interest holder was not a party to
 the offense giving rise to the forfeiture and [that] the
 contraband:
 (A)  was stolen from the owner or interest holder
 before being used in the commission of the offense giving rise to
 the forfeiture;
 (B)  was purchased with:
 (i)  money stolen from the owner or interest
 holder; or
 (ii)  proceeds from the sale of property
 stolen from the owner or interest holder; or
 (C)  was used or intended to be used without the
 effective consent of the owner or interest holder in the commission
 of the offense giving rise to the forfeiture.
 (1-a) The state has the burden of proving by clear and
 convincing evidence that the circumstances described by
 Subdivision (1) do not apply to property that is subject to seizure
 and forfeiture under this chapter.
 SECTION 3.  Article 59.021(d), Code of Criminal Procedure,
 is amended to read as follows:
 (d)  After seizure of the substitute property, the
 disposition shall proceed as other cases in this chapter except
 that the attorney representing the state must prove by clear and
 convincing [a preponderance of the] evidence:
 (1)  that the contraband described by Subsection (b)
 was subject to seizure and forfeiture under this chapter;
 (2)  the highest fair market value of that contraband
 during the period in which the owner of the substitute property
 owned, or had an interest in, the contraband;
 (3)  the fair market value of the substitute property
 at the time it was seized; and
 (4)  that the owner of the substitute property owned or
 had an interest in contraband with an aggregate value of $200,000 or
 more in connection with the commission of an underlying offense
 giving rise to the forfeiture.
 SECTION 4.  Article 59.05(b), Code of Criminal Procedure, is
 amended to read as follows:
 (b)  All cases under this chapter shall proceed to trial in
 the same manner as in other civil cases. The state has the burden of
 proving by clear and convincing [a preponderance of the] evidence
 that property is subject to forfeiture.
 SECTION 5.  Article 59.06, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
 amended by amending Subsections (d) and (d-1) and adding Subsection
 (d-5) to read as follows:
 (d)  Proceeds and property awarded under this chapter to a
 law enforcement agency or to the attorney representing the state
 may be spent by the agency or the attorney only after a budget for
 the expenditure of the proceeds and property has been submitted to
 the commissioners court or governing body of the municipality and
 the commissioners court or governing body approves the expenditure
 in the manner provided by Subsection (d-5).  The budget must be
 detailed and clearly list and define the categories of
 expenditures, but may not list details that would endanger the
 security of an investigation or prosecution.  Expenditures are
 subject to the audit and enforcement provisions established under
 this chapter.  A commissioners court or governing body of a
 municipality may not use the existence of an award to offset or
 decrease total salaries, expenses, and allowances that the agency
 or the attorney receives from the commissioners court or governing
 body at or after the time the award of proceeds or property is made
 [are awarded].
 (d-1)  The head of a law enforcement agency or an attorney
 representing the state may not use proceeds or property received
 under this chapter to:
 (1)  contribute to a political campaign;
 (2)  make a donation to any entity, except as provided
 by Subsection (d-2);
 (3)  pay expenses related to the training or education
 of any member of the judiciary;
 (4)  pay any travel expenses related to attendance at
 training or education seminars if the expenses violate generally
 applicable restrictions established by the commissioners court or
 governing body of the municipality, as applicable;
 (5)  purchase alcoholic beverages;
 (6)  pay for a recurring expense [make any expenditure
 not approved by the commissioners court or governing body of the
 municipality, as applicable, if the head of a law enforcement
 agency or attorney representing the state holds an elective office
 and:
 [(A)     the deadline for filing an application for a
 place on the ballot as a candidate for reelection to that office in
 the general primary election has passed and the person did not file
 an application for a place on that ballot; or
 [(B)     during the person's current term of office,
 the person was a candidate in a primary, general, or runoff election
 for reelection to that office and was not the prevailing candidate
 in that election]; or
 (7)  pay [increase] a salary [, expense, or allowance]
 for an employee of the law enforcement agency or attorney
 representing the state [who is budgeted by the commissioners court
 or governing body of the municipality unless the commissioners
 court or governing body first approves the increase].
 (d-5)  A commissioners court or governing body of a
 municipality may approve an expenditure of proceeds or property
 under this chapter only at an open meeting under Chapter 551,
 Government Code.  Each expenditure must be approved by a separate
 vote of the commissioners court or governing body.  The
 commissioners court or governing body shall include in the written
 notice of any meeting in which the commissioners court or governing
 body will consider an expenditure described by this subsection:
 (1)  a description of the expenditure;
 (2)  the purpose of the expenditure; and
 (3)  the amount of the expenditure.
 SECTION 6.  Article 59.061, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
 amended by amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsection (a-1) to
 read as follows:
 (a)  The state auditor may at any time [perform an audit or]
 conduct an investigation, in accordance with this article and
 Chapter 321, Government Code, related to the seizure, forfeiture,
 receipt, and specific expenditure of proceeds and property received
 under this chapter.
 (a-1)  At least annually, the state auditor shall perform an
 audit of each law enforcement agency or attorney representing the
 state, in accordance with this article and Chapter 321, Government
 Code, that is related to the seizure, forfeiture, receipt, and
 specific expenditure of proceeds and property received under this
 chapter by the agency or attorney.
 SECTION 7.  The changes in law made by this Act to Article
 59.06, Code of Criminal Procedure, apply only to the expenditure of
 proceeds or property by a law enforcement agency or attorney
 representing the state on or after the effective date of this Act.
 The expenditure of proceeds or property by a law enforcement agency
 or attorney representing the state before the effective date of
 this Act is governed by the law in effect on the date the
 expenditure was made, and the former law is continued in effect for
 that purpose.
 SECTION 8.  The changes in law made by this Act to Articles
 59.02, 59.021, and 59.05, Code of Criminal Procedure, apply only to
 a forfeiture proceeding that begins on or after the effective date
 of this Act. A forfeiture proceeding that begins before the
 effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the
 date the proceeding begins, and the former law is continued in
 effect for that purpose.
 SECTION 9.   This Act takes effect September 1, 2017.