Texas 2017 85th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB326 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            March 13, 2017      TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB326 by Burton (Relating to the authority of a court to return certain fees to a person whose criminal record has been expunged.), As Introduced    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to authorize a court that grants a petition for expunction of a criminal record to order that any fee, or portion of a fee, required to be paid in relation to the petition be returned to the petitioner. Based on the analysis of the Office of Court Administration (OCA), Department of Public Safety, and Comptroller of Public Accounts, duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be accomplished by utilizing existing resources. Based on the analysis of OCA, a decrease in revenue is anticipated from reimbursing fees associated with the filing of a petition for expunction. The exact amount of the impact cannot determined because fees vary from county to county and reimbursement of the fees is discretionary, not mandatory; however, the fiscal impact to the state is not anticipated to be significant. Local Government Impact Local governments are anticipated to realize a decrease in revenues from reimbursing fees associated with the filing of a petition for expunction; however, a significant fiscal impact is not anticipated.    Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 405 Department of Public Safety   LBB Staff:  UP, KJo, MW, GDz    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 13, 2017





  TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB326 by Burton (Relating to the authority of a court to return certain fees to a person whose criminal record has been expunged.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB326 by Burton (Relating to the authority of a court to return certain fees to a person whose criminal record has been expunged.), As Introduced

 Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice 

 Honorable John Whitmire, Chair, Senate Committee on Criminal Justice 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

SB326 by Burton (Relating to the authority of a court to return certain fees to a person whose criminal record has been expunged.), As Introduced

SB326 by Burton (Relating to the authority of a court to return certain fees to a person whose criminal record has been expunged.), As Introduced



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to authorize a court that grants a petition for expunction of a criminal record to order that any fee, or portion of a fee, required to be paid in relation to the petition be returned to the petitioner. Based on the analysis of the Office of Court Administration (OCA), Department of Public Safety, and Comptroller of Public Accounts, duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be accomplished by utilizing existing resources. Based on the analysis of OCA, a decrease in revenue is anticipated from reimbursing fees associated with the filing of a petition for expunction. The exact amount of the impact cannot determined because fees vary from county to county and reimbursement of the fees is discretionary, not mandatory; however, the fiscal impact to the state is not anticipated to be significant.

Local Government Impact

Local governments are anticipated to realize a decrease in revenues from reimbursing fees associated with the filing of a petition for expunction; however, a significant fiscal impact is not anticipated.

Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 405 Department of Public Safety

212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 405 Department of Public Safety

LBB Staff: UP, KJo, MW, GDz

 UP, KJo, MW, GDz