LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 18, 2017 TO: Honorable Joe Moody, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB326 by Burton (Relating to the authority of a court to return certain fees to a person whose criminal record has been expunged.), As Engrossed No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to authorize a court that grants a petition for expunction of a criminal record to order that any fee, or portion of a fee, required to be paid in relation to the petition be returned to the petitioner. Based on the analysis of the Office of Court Administration (OCA), Department of Public Safety, and Comptroller of Public Accounts, duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be accomplished by utilizing existing resources.Based on the analysis of OCA, a decrease in revenue is anticipated from reimbursing fees associated with the filing of a petition for expunction. The exact amount of the impact cannot determined because fees vary from county to county and reimbursement of the fees is discretionary, not mandatory; however, the fiscal impact to the state is not anticipated to be significant. Local Government Impact Local governments are anticipated to realize a decrease in revenues from reimbursing fees associated with the filing of a petition for expunction; however, a significant fiscal impact is not anticipated. Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 405 Department of Public Safety LBB Staff: UP, KJo, MW, GDz
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 18, 2017
TO: Honorable Joe Moody, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB326 by Burton (Relating to the authority of a court to return certain fees to a person whose criminal record has been expunged.), As Engrossed
TO: Honorable Joe Moody, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB326 by Burton (Relating to the authority of a court to return certain fees to a person whose criminal record has been expunged.), As Engrossed
Honorable Joe Moody, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Honorable Joe Moody, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB326 by Burton (Relating to the authority of a court to return certain fees to a person whose criminal record has been expunged.), As Engrossed
SB326 by Burton (Relating to the authority of a court to return certain fees to a person whose criminal record has been expunged.), As Engrossed
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to authorize a court that grants a petition for expunction of a criminal record to order that any fee, or portion of a fee, required to be paid in relation to the petition be returned to the petitioner. Based on the analysis of the Office of Court Administration (OCA), Department of Public Safety, and Comptroller of Public Accounts, duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be accomplished by utilizing existing resources.Based on the analysis of OCA, a decrease in revenue is anticipated from reimbursing fees associated with the filing of a petition for expunction. The exact amount of the impact cannot determined because fees vary from county to county and reimbursement of the fees is discretionary, not mandatory; however, the fiscal impact to the state is not anticipated to be significant.
Local Government Impact
Local governments are anticipated to realize a decrease in revenues from reimbursing fees associated with the filing of a petition for expunction; however, a significant fiscal impact is not anticipated.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 405 Department of Public Safety
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 405 Department of Public Safety
LBB Staff: UP, KJo, MW, GDz
UP, KJo, MW, GDz