Texas 2017 85th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB43 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/02/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            March 29, 2017      TO: Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB43 by Zaffirini (Relating to the Judicial Branch Certification Commission; authorizing fees; modifying existing penalties.), As Introduced    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Government Code to revise various provisions relating to the operations of the Judicial Branch Certification Commission (JBCC). The bill would create processes and procedures for the reissuance of licenses and would standardizes processes relating to examination, license renewal, and conducting hearings on suspended licenses to create efficiencies and uniformity in the regulation of four professions by the JBCC. The bill would also authorize the JBCC to impose a standardized graduated late renewal fee for renewing a license after its expiration and would prohibit the renewal of a license which has been expired for a year or longer. The OCA reports that this is identical to late renewal fees currently charged for two of the professions regulated by the JBCC under current law.Based on the assessment of the Office of Court Administration (OCA), duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be accomplished by utilizing existing resources. Based on information provided by OCA, only two of the four professions regulated by the JBCC are not charged a specific late renewal fee without an automatic 1-year cancellation under current law. OCA anticipates that less than one percent of the licensees would renew their licenses under the provisions of the bill after expiration in each fiscal year based on actual amounts renewed in fiscal year 2015. Based on the assessment of the OCA and the Comptroller of Public Accounts, revenue gains to the General Revenue Fund that would be realized from new fees being assessed on the small number of licenses from the two programs not currently charging a late fee would not be significant. This analysis also assumes that any fees assessed would be set at levels necessary to generate amounts to cover the costs of operating the regulatory functions of the JBCC in accordance with statutory requirements. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts   LBB Staff:  UP, AG, MW, GDz    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 29, 2017





  TO: Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs      FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:SB43 by Zaffirini (Relating to the Judicial Branch Certification Commission; authorizing fees; modifying existing penalties.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs
FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB43 by Zaffirini (Relating to the Judicial Branch Certification Commission; authorizing fees; modifying existing penalties.), As Introduced

 Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs 

 Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs 

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board

SB43 by Zaffirini (Relating to the Judicial Branch Certification Commission; authorizing fees; modifying existing penalties.), As Introduced

SB43 by Zaffirini (Relating to the Judicial Branch Certification Commission; authorizing fees; modifying existing penalties.), As Introduced



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Government Code to revise various provisions relating to the operations of the Judicial Branch Certification Commission (JBCC). The bill would create processes and procedures for the reissuance of licenses and would standardizes processes relating to examination, license renewal, and conducting hearings on suspended licenses to create efficiencies and uniformity in the regulation of four professions by the JBCC. The bill would also authorize the JBCC to impose a standardized graduated late renewal fee for renewing a license after its expiration and would prohibit the renewal of a license which has been expired for a year or longer. The OCA reports that this is identical to late renewal fees currently charged for two of the professions regulated by the JBCC under current law.Based on the assessment of the Office of Court Administration (OCA), duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be accomplished by utilizing existing resources. Based on information provided by OCA, only two of the four professions regulated by the JBCC are not charged a specific late renewal fee without an automatic 1-year cancellation under current law. OCA anticipates that less than one percent of the licensees would renew their licenses under the provisions of the bill after expiration in each fiscal year based on actual amounts renewed in fiscal year 2015. Based on the assessment of the OCA and the Comptroller of Public Accounts, revenue gains to the General Revenue Fund that would be realized from new fees being assessed on the small number of licenses from the two programs not currently charging a late fee would not be significant. This analysis also assumes that any fees assessed would be set at levels necessary to generate amounts to cover the costs of operating the regulatory functions of the JBCC in accordance with statutory requirements.

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts

212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts

LBB Staff: UP, AG, MW, GDz

 UP, AG, MW, GDz