LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 22, 2017 TO: Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB528 by Birdwell (Relating to the term of a chief administrative law judge.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Government Code relating to the term of a chief administrative law judge. Under the provisions of the bill, the term of a chief administrative law judge would expire on May 15th of each even-numbered year. The State Office of Administrative Hearings anticipates any additional work resulting from the passage of the bill could be reasonably absorbed within current resources. Local Government Impact No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:360 State Office of Administrative Hearings LBB Staff: UP, AG, EH, EK LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 85TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 22, 2017 TO: Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:SB528 by Birdwell (Relating to the term of a chief administrative law judge.), As Introduced TO: Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs FROM: Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: SB528 by Birdwell (Relating to the term of a chief administrative law judge.), As Introduced Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs Honorable Joan Huffman, Chair, Senate Committee on State Affairs Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board SB528 by Birdwell (Relating to the term of a chief administrative law judge.), As Introduced SB528 by Birdwell (Relating to the term of a chief administrative law judge.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Government Code relating to the term of a chief administrative law judge. Under the provisions of the bill, the term of a chief administrative law judge would expire on May 15th of each even-numbered year. The State Office of Administrative Hearings anticipates any additional work resulting from the passage of the bill could be reasonably absorbed within current resources. Local Government Impact No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: 360 State Office of Administrative Hearings 360 State Office of Administrative Hearings LBB Staff: UP, AG, EH, EK UP, AG, EH, EK