86R5162 ADM-D
By: Rose H.B. No. 1936
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
relating to the applicability of the death penalty to a capital
offense committed by a person with severe mental illness.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Title 1, Code of Criminal Procedure, is amended
by adding Chapter 46D to read as follows:
CHAPTER 46D. CAPITAL CASE: EFFECT OF SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS
Art. 46D.001. DEFINITION. In this chapter, "person with
severe mental illness" means a person who has schizophrenia, a
schizoaffective disorder, or a bipolar disorder and, as a result of
that disorder, has active psychotic symptoms that substantially
impair the person's capacity to:
(1) appreciate the nature, consequences, or
wrongfulness of the person's conduct; or
(2) exercise rational judgment in relation to the
person's conduct.
Art. 46D.002. RESTRICTION ON DEATH PENALTY. A defendant
who at the time of the commission of a capital offense was a person
with severe mental illness may not be sentenced to death.
Art. 46D.003. HEARING; DETERMINATION. (a) The attorney
for a defendant in a capital case, not later than the 30th day
before the date trial is scheduled to begin, may request in writing
that the judge hearing the case hold a hearing to determine whether
the defendant was a person with severe mental illness at the time of
the commission of the alleged offense.
(b) A request under Subsection (a) must be accompanied by
evidence supporting the claim that the defendant was a person with
severe mental illness at the time of the commission of the alleged
offense.
(c) If the defendant does not submit the request within the
period required by Subsection (a), the judge may not hold a hearing
under this article unless the judge finds that good cause existed
for the failure to timely request the hearing.
(d) On receipt of a request under Subsection (a), the judge
shall notify the attorney representing the state of the request and
allow the attorney an opportunity to respond. If the judge finds
that the request was timely filed under Subsection (a) and was
accompanied by the supporting evidence described by Subsection (b),
the judge shall hold a hearing to determine whether the defendant
was a person with severe mental illness at the time of the
commission of the alleged offense.
(e) If the judge finds that the request was not timely filed
under Subsection (a) or was not accompanied by the supporting
evidence described by Subsection (b), the judge shall:
(1) deny the defendant's request;
(2) make written findings of fact explaining the
grounds for the denial;
(3) provide the findings of fact to the defendant and
the attorney representing the state; and
(4) file a copy of the findings of fact with the papers
in the case.
(f) At the conclusion of the hearing under this article, the
judge shall make the determination described by Subsection (d).
Art. 46D.004. BURDEN OF PROOF. At a hearing under Article
46D.003, the defendant must prove by clear and convincing evidence
that the defendant was a person with severe mental illness at the
time of the commission of the alleged offense.
Art. 46D.005. EFFECT OF DETERMINATION ON SUBSEQUENT TRIAL.
(a) If the judge determines after a hearing under Article 46D.003
that the defendant was a person with severe mental illness at the
time of the commission of an alleged capital offense, and the
defendant is subsequently convicted of that offense, Article 37.071
does not apply to the defendant, and the judge shall sentence the
defendant to imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal
Justice for life without parole.
(b) If the judge determines after a hearing under Article
46D.003 that the defendant was not a person with severe mental
illness at the time of the commission of an alleged capital offense,
the judge shall conduct the trial of that offense in the same manner
as if a hearing under Article 46D.003 had not been held. At the
trial of the offense the jury may not be informed of the fact that
the judge has determined that the defendant was not a person with
severe mental illness, and that determination does not prohibit the
defendant from introducing evidence of a mental disability as
otherwise permitted by law.
Art. 46D.006. APPOINTMENT OF DISINTERESTED EXPERT. (a) On
the request of either party or on the judge's own motion, the judge
shall appoint a disinterested expert experienced and qualified in
the field of diagnosing mental illness to examine the defendant and
determine whether the defendant is a person with severe mental
illness.
(b) The judge may, after giving notice to the defendant,
order the defendant to submit to an examination by an expert
appointed under this article.
(c) An examination described by this article:
(1) must be narrowly tailored to determine whether the
defendant has the specific disorder claimed; and
(2) may not include an assessment of the risk of danger
the defendant may pose to any person.
(d) An expert appointed under this article must provide the
defendant's attorney with all notes and data from the examination.
Art. 46D.007. STATEMENT NOT ADMISSIBLE. A statement made
by the defendant in a hearing or examination under this chapter may
not be admitted into evidence during the trial of the offense.
Art. 46D.008. INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL. Neither the defendant
nor the state is entitled to make an interlocutory appeal of a
determination made under Article 46D.003.
SECTION 2. Chapter 46D, Code of Criminal Procedure, as
added by this Act, applies only to a trial that commences on or
after the effective date of this Act, regardless of whether the
alleged offense was committed before, on, or after that date.
SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2019.