Texas Senate Bill SB2523

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Relating to the creation of the Harris County Municipal Utility District No. 572; granting a limited power of eminent domain; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments, fees, and taxes.

Impact

The creation of the Harris County Municipal Utility District No. 572 is expected to have significant implications for local governance and infrastructure development in the area. It establishes a formal mechanism for the district to manage public utilities, which could streamline local service provisions and enhance infrastructure investments. By allowing the district to issue bonds without needing an election for projects not covered by ad valorem taxes, the bill facilitates quicker financing solutions for necessary improvements and expansions in local utilities and road construction.

Summary

SB2523 is a legislative proposal aimed at the establishment of the Harris County Municipal Utility District No. 572. The bill outlines specific provisions granting the district limited powers, including the ability to issue bonds, impose assessments, fees, and taxes. It emphasizes the district's role in serving public purposes and the regulation of municipal utilities, including the creation and maintenance of infrastructure like roads and storm drainage systems. The bill is structured to ensure that the district operates within the framework of existing Texas laws concerning municipal utility districts, as per Article XVI, Section 59 of the Texas Constitution.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment around SB2523 appears to be cautious but generally supportive among proponents of enhanced local infrastructure. Advocates argue that having a dedicated utility district will improve the management of public services and infrastructure reliability. However, concerns may arise regarding the local governance aspect, particularly regarding the potential implications of the limited eminent domain power granted to the district, which may be viewed as controversial in terms of land acquisition for development and construction projects.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the provision for limited eminent domain powers, which can lead to debate over the rights of property owners versus the necessity of public infrastructure projects. Critics may argue that allowing the district to exercise limited eminent domain could infringe on individual property rights, whereas supporters would likely counter that such powers are essential for the effective execution of public utility and infrastructure goals. The bill also outlines requirements for municipal consent before elections can be held to confirm the creation of the district, ensuring that local governments have a say in its formation and operations.