Texas Senate Bill SCR67

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Instructing the enrolling clerk of the senate to make corrections in S.B. No. 500.

Impact

The passage of SCR67 signifies a procedural step in the legislative process, ensuring that the final enrolled version of SB500 is free from errors that could potentially affect its implementation. By correcting errors such as misallocated funding sources or incorrect section references, SCR67 helped to maintain the integrity of the legislative process. The corrections pertain to appropriations for programs including special education and surge operations, which are critical for effective governance and resource allocation.

Summary

SCR67 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution that was adopted to instruct the enrolling clerk of the Senate to make specific corrections to Senate Bill No. 500. This resolution addresses corrections to technical errors identified in SB500, which had already been passed by both the Senate and the House of Representatives. The resolution emphasizes the importance of accuracy in legislative documentation and aims to ensure that finalized bills reflect the intended legislative decisions without errors.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR67 was largely positive, as it reflects a bipartisan agreement on the need for technical accuracy in legislation. The resolution passed with overwhelming support in both chambers, indicating a consensus among lawmakers on the importance of correcting legislative documents. This measure is viewed as a responsible action that enhances the legislative process rather than a contentious issue, showcasing a collaborative effort to address procedural necessities.

Contention

While SCR67 itself does not present significant points of contention, its context lies within the broader legislative framework of SB500. The resolution's focus on technical corrections may hint at past challenges faced in the legislative process regarding similar bills. Ensuring that such corrections are made helps to prevent inefficiencies or misunderstandings during the implementation phase, which can lead to disputes in state law applications.